Publication:
Comparison of Heat Generation During Implant Drilling Using Stainless Steel and Ceramic Drills

dc.authorscopusid55909449700
dc.authorscopusid35311493500
dc.authorscopusid36060550400
dc.authorscopusid35366257300
dc.authorscopusid56007565100
dc.contributor.authorSümer, M.
dc.contributor.authorMısır, A.F.
dc.contributor.authorTelcioǧlu, N.T.
dc.contributor.authorGüler, A.U.
dc.contributor.authorYenísey, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:40:19Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:40:19Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Sümer] Mahmut, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Mısır] Ahmet Ferhat, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Zonguldak, Turkey; [Telcioǧlu] Nazife Tuba, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Güler] Ahmet Umut, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yenísey] Murat, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this study was to compare the heat generated from implant drilling using stainless steel and ceramic drills. Materials and Methods A total of 40 fresh bovine femoral cortical bone samples were used in this study. A constant drill load of 2.0 kg was applied throughout the drilling procedures via a drilling rig at a speed of 1,500 rpm. Two different implant drill types (stainless steel and ceramic) were evaluated. Heat was measured with type K thermocouple from 3 different depths. Data were subjected to the independent-sample t test and Pearson correlation analysis. The α level was set a priori at 0.05. Results The mean maximum temperatures at the depths of 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm with the stainless steel drill were 32.15°C, 35.94°C, and 37.05°C, respectively, and those with the ceramic drill were 34.49°C, 36.73°C, and 36.52°C, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found at the depth of 3 mm (P = .014) whereas there was no significant difference at the depths of 6 and 9 mm (P > .05) between stainless steel and ceramic drills. Conclusion Within the limitations of the study, although more heat was generated in the superficial part of the drilling cavity with the ceramic drill, heat modifications seemed not to be correlated with the drill type, whether stainless steel or ceramic, in the deep aspect of the cavity. Further clinical studies are required to determine the effect of drill type on heat generation. © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.001
dc.identifier.endpage1354en_US
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.issn1531-5053
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21292371
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79955009400
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1350en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.001
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290242300028
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of Heat Generation During Implant Drilling Using Stainless Steel and Ceramic Drillsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files