Publication:
Evaluation of Red Meat Allergy Patients and Review of the Literature

dc.contributor.authorKutluğ, Şeyhan
dc.contributor.authorHancioglu, Gonca
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Fadil
dc.contributor.authorKaradağ, Şefika İlknur Kökcü
dc.contributor.authorSancak, Recep
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:29:17Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-tempOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. It was reported that prevalence of red meat allergy in children was higher in our country than in\rwestern populations. However, the diagnosis of these patients is often delayed. The aim of the study was to\rpresent the clinical and laboratory characteristics of our red meat allergy patients.\rMethods. The data were collected retrospectively from the files of children with red meat allergy. Also, 6 adults\rwith red meat allergies were recorded in the families of the children. Patients with symptoms associated with\rred meat allergy and sensitive to beef or mutton in prick-to-prick tests were recorded.\rResults. The median age of the 43 patients was 12 years (2-37), and 51% were male. Most of the patients were\rchildren (n=37, 86%). The median age was 10 years in children (2-17), and 54% were male. All of the children\rhad dermatologic manifestations, 51% had respiratory symptoms, and 64% had anaphylaxis upon exposure to\rred meat. The anaphylaxis history was not associated with demographic, clinical and laboratory data. A total of\r63% children had additional allergic diseases, and 75% of them were sensitive to both mutton and beef in prickto-prick tests. The median total IgE level of the children was 327 (20-3550) IU/mL, median eosinophil count was\r210/mm3\r (40-990) and mean vitamin D was 13.1 ± 1.2 mcg/L (n=27). Anaphylaxis occurred in 3 of 9 patients who\rreceived the open oral food challenge (OFC) test. After OFC, 3 patients continued to eat red meat without issues,\rand 1 patient was recommended to eat alternatives to red meat.\rConclusions. Clinical and laboratory findings were heterogeneous in children with red meat allergy.\rAnaphylaxis risk seems to be higher than other food allergies. OFC test is more helpful in both diagnosis and\ralternative red meat selection compared to laboratory findings.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.24953/turkjped.2021.05.011
dc.identifier.endpage845en_US
dc.identifier.issn0041-4301
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage832en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2021.05.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36682
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Pediatricsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTıbbi Araştırmalar Deneyselen_US
dc.subjectGenel ve Dahili Tıpen_US
dc.subjectMikrobiyolojien_US
dc.subjectAlerjien_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Red Meat Allergy Patients and Review of the Literatureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files