Publication: Evaluation of Red Meat Allergy Patients and Review of the Literature
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Background. It was reported that prevalence of red meat allergy in children was higher in our country than in\rwestern populations. However, the diagnosis of these patients is often delayed. The aim of the study was to\rpresent the clinical and laboratory characteristics of our red meat allergy patients.\rMethods. The data were collected retrospectively from the files of children with red meat allergy. Also, 6 adults\rwith red meat allergies were recorded in the families of the children. Patients with symptoms associated with\rred meat allergy and sensitive to beef or mutton in prick-to-prick tests were recorded.\rResults. The median age of the 43 patients was 12 years (2-37), and 51% were male. Most of the patients were\rchildren (n=37, 86%). The median age was 10 years in children (2-17), and 54% were male. All of the children\rhad dermatologic manifestations, 51% had respiratory symptoms, and 64% had anaphylaxis upon exposure to\rred meat. The anaphylaxis history was not associated with demographic, clinical and laboratory data. A total of\r63% children had additional allergic diseases, and 75% of them were sensitive to both mutton and beef in prickto-prick tests. The median total IgE level of the children was 327 (20-3550) IU/mL, median eosinophil count was\r210/mm3\r (40-990) and mean vitamin D was 13.1 ± 1.2 mcg/L (n=27). Anaphylaxis occurred in 3 of 9 patients who\rreceived the open oral food challenge (OFC) test. After OFC, 3 patients continued to eat red meat without issues,\rand 1 patient was recommended to eat alternatives to red meat.\rConclusions. Clinical and laboratory findings were heterogeneous in children with red meat allergy.\rAnaphylaxis risk seems to be higher than other food allergies. OFC test is more helpful in both diagnosis and\ralternative red meat selection compared to laboratory findings.
Description
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q3
Source
Turkish Journal of Pediatrics
Volume
63
Issue
5
Start Page
832
End Page
845
