Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoluman, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorGolcu, Berfin Melikoglu
dc.contributor.authorDerin, Okan
dc.contributor.authorOzkok, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorAnniballi, Fabrizio
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:04:14Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:04:14Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1300-0128
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1209-40
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15574
dc.descriptionANNIBALLI, FABRIZIO/0000-0003-3273-9638; KOLUMAN, AHMET/0000-0001-5308-8884; Kizil, Sibel/0000-0003-0697-3092; Derin, Okan/0000-0001-6311-5428en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000327449800016en_US
dc.description.abstractClostridium botulinum and rare strains of C. butyricum and C. baratii produce an extremely potent toxin, the botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT). Infant botulism is significant for both its high mortality rates and for the sophisticated treatment that it requires. Isolation and identification of C. botulinum according to standards depend on mouse bioassays to determine toxin-producing ability of strains. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used to detect the types of toxins expressed by bacteria. Since honey is an important source of infant botulism, we determined the types of toxins secreted by C. botulinum strains and their antibiotic resistance. In this study, the first step was conducted to determine the prevalence of C. botulinum in different honey types; as the second step, antibiotic susceptibility of the strains was determined; and, finally, PCR typing of toxin genes was done. Nineteen strains were isolated from 250 honey samples. All C. botulinum strains were evaluated for BoNT types using PCR. BoNT type A was observed in 12 of the 19 (63.15%) strains, type B was observed in 3 (15.78%) strains, type F was recorded in 2 (10.52%) strains, and 2 of the 19 (10.52%) strains showed no amplification. All strains represented a resistance to amoxicillin and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (100%), followed with sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin (94.73%). Resistance to nalidixic acid was seen in 84.21%. The results show that different types of honey are contaminated with C. botulinum and toxin types also show different distribution. Additionally, antibiotic resistance patterns of the strains showed different distributions, which indicates obligatory application of antibiotic resistance testing for prevention of secondary infections.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherScientific Technical Research Council Turkey-Tubitaken_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3906/vet-1209-40en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectClostridium botulinumen_US
dc.subjecthoneyen_US
dc.subjectPCRen_US
dc.titleClostridium botulinum in honey: prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of isolated strainsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage706en_US
dc.identifier.endpage711en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record