Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYenisey, Murat
dc.contributor.authorKulunk, Safak
dc.contributor.authorKaleli, Necati
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:19:11Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:19:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12617
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/12394
dc.descriptionWOS: 000405822000020en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 28383117en_US
dc.description.abstractObturator prosthesis is a common treatment method for maxillectomy patients for maintaining their oronasal separation and resuming their social lives. After tumor resection, the remaining anatomical structures have a significant effect on prosthesis retention. The present study describes the rehabilitation of two maxillectomy patients after cancer surgery using a prosthesis consisting of a denture and a special retentive obturator that is positioned in the anatomical undercuts of the nasal cavity. These patients have undergone total and subtotal maxillectomy surgery after the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. The systemic and local health status of the total maxillectomy patient was not suitable for zygomatic implant surgery. Only one osseointegrated dental implant was placed into the left maxillary tuberosity area in the subtotal maxillectomy patient. In addition, the quality, vertical height, and horizontal width of the remaining bone structures in the maxilla limited the use of osseointegrated dental implants. Mechanical prosthesis retention was provided using a multiunit retentive mechanism composed of an orthodontic forsus fatigue resistant device (OFFRD), two Herbst appliances, and an acrylic piece associated with healthy keratinized mucosa. The OFFRD could easily apply a consistent force and push the acrylic pieces toward the retentive undercut under the control of the two Herbst appliances. Two OFFRD units in different directions were designed for the total maxillectomy patient, while only one OFFRD unit was placed on the opposite side of the osseointegrated implant in the subtotal maxillectomy patient. A sufficient retention was obtained for both patients. The patients were satisfied, and no major complications were observed in periodic controls.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/jopr.12617en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMaxillectomyen_US
dc.subjectobturator prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectoronasal separationen_US
dc.titleAn Alternative Prosthetic Approach for Rehabilitation of Two Edentulous Maxillectomy Patients: Clinical Reporten_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage483en_US
dc.identifier.endpage488en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster