Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUsta, Mirac Baris
dc.contributor.authorKarabekiroglu, Koray
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Berkan
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Muazzez
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorKaraosman, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorUrer, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:26:23Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:26:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2475-0573
dc.identifier.issn2475-0581
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2018.1545334
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10729
dc.descriptionUsta, Mirac Baris/0000-0002-1573-3165; Sahin, Berkan/0000-0003-4699-3418en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000481832500012en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE Studies show partial improvements in some core symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in time. However, the predictive factors (e.g. pretreatment IQ, comorbid psychiatric disorders, adaptive, and language skills, etc.) for a better the outcome was not studied with machine learning methods. We aimed to examine the predictors of outcome with machine learning methods, which are novel computational methods including statistical estimation, information theories and mathematical learning automatically discovering useful patterns in large amounts of data. METHOD The study the group comprised 433 children (mean age: 72.3 +/- 45.9 months) with ASD diagnosis. The ASD symptoms were assessed by the Autism Behavior Checklist, Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Clinical Global Impression scales at baseline (T0) and 12th (T1), 24th (T2), and 36th (T3) months. We tested the performance of for machine learning algorithms (Naive Bayes, Generalized Linear Model, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree) on our data, including the 254 items in the baseline forms. Patients with <= 2 CGI points in ASD symptoms at in 36 months were accepted as the group who has "better outcome" as the prediction class. RESULTS The significant proportion of the cases showed significant improvement in ASD symptoms (39.7% in T1, 60.7% in T2; 77.8% in T3). Our machine learning model in T3 showed that diagnosis group affected the prognosis. In the autism group, older father and mother age; in PDD-NOS group, MR comorbidity, less birth weight and older age at diagnosis have a worse outcome. In Asperger's Disorder age at diagnosis, age at first evaluation and developmental cornerstones has affected prognosis. CONCLUSION In accordance with other studies we found early age diagnosis, early start rehabilitation, the severity of ASD symptoms at baseline assessment predicted outcome. Also, we found comorbid psychiatric diagnoses are affecting the outcome of ASD symptoms in clinical observation. The machine learning models reveal several others are more significant (e.g. parental age, birth weight, sociodemographic variables, etc.) in terms of prognostic information and also planning treatment of children with ASD.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/24750573.2018.1545334en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAutismen_US
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjectprognosisen_US
dc.subjectpredictive measuresen_US
dc.titleUse of machine learning methods in prediction of short-term outcome in autism spectrum disordersen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage320en_US
dc.identifier.endpage325en_US
dc.relation.journalPsychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster