Publication:
Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Partial-Coherence Interferometry Optical Biometers

dc.authorscopusid55125592200
dc.authorscopusid56393872100
dc.authorscopusid56702793300
dc.authorscopusid6603543240
dc.contributor.authorCan, E.
dc.contributor.authorDuran, M.
dc.contributor.authorCetinkaya, T.
dc.contributor.authorAritürk, N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:31:57Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:31:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Can] Ertugrul, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Duran] Mustafa, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Cetinkaya] Tuğba, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Aritürk] Nurşen, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAims: To evaluate a new noncontact optical biometer using partial-coherence interferometry and to compare the clinical measurements with those obtained from the device using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR). Setting and Design: Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Nonrandomized, prospective clinical trial Subjects and Methods: The study was performed on the healthy phakic eyes of volunteers in the year 2014. Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), mean keratometry (K), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements obtained with the low-time coherence interferometry (LTCI) were compared with those obtained with the OLCR. Statistical Analysis Used: The results were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired t-test, and its correlation was evaluated by Pearson′s coefficient. RESULTS: We examined seventy participants with a mean age of 33.06 (±9.7) (range: 19-53) years. AL measurements with LTCI and OLCR were 23.7 (±1.08) mm and 23.7 (±1.1) mm, respectively. ACD was 3.6 (±0.4) mm and 3.5 (±0.4) mm for LTCI and OLCR, respectively. The mean CCT measurements for both devices were 533 (±28) mm and 522 (±28) mm, respectively. The mean K readings measurements for LTCI and OLCR were 43.3 (±1.5) D and 43.3 (±1.5) D, respectively. The mean WTW distance measurements for both devices were 12.0 (±0.5) mm and 12.1 (±0.5) mm, respectively. Conclusions: Measurements with LTCI correlated well with those with the OLCR. These two devices showed good agreement for the measurement of all parameters. © 2016 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/0974-9233.194075
dc.identifier.endpage292en_US
dc.identifier.issn0974-9233
dc.identifier.issn0975-1599
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27994390
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85000916430
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage288en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.194075
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000389354000002
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMedknow Publications B9, Kanara Business Centre, off Link Road, Ghatkopar (E) Mumbai 400 075en_US
dc.relation.ispartofMiddle East African Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.journalMiddle East African Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAxial Lengthen_US
dc.subjectLow Time Coherence Interferometryen_US
dc.subjectOptical Biometeren_US
dc.subjectOptical Low-Coherence Reflectometryen_US
dc.titleComparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Partial-Coherence Interferometry Optical Biometersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files