Publication:
An Evaluation of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle and Quality of Life Among Turkish Workers, 2017

dc.authorscopusid55279911600
dc.authorscopusid58550381900
dc.authorscopusid55312616200
dc.contributor.authorTerzi, Ö.
dc.contributor.authorKarasu, Ö.
dc.contributor.authorArslan, H.N.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:24:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Terzi] Özlem Zel, Department of Public Health, Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Samsun, Turkey; [Karasu] Özge, Samsun Provincial Health Directorate, Samsun, Samsun, Turkey; [Arslan] Hatice Nilden, Department of Public Health, Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The examination of workers’ health behaviors and their quality of life, as well as providing support in missing areas are important in terms of both occupational health and community health. This study aims to assess workers’ quality of life and health-promoting lifestyle in a workplace in 2017 and to determine their relationship with some socio-demographic characteristics. Material and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted from January to March 2017 in Samsun province. A total of 151 workers participated in the study. The data were collected using a questionnaire on workers’ socio-demographic characteristics, Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II), and Short Form-36 Quality of Life Scale (SF-36). The mean values were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. The correlation was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation analysis. In addition, p-value 0<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The workers had an average of 132.48±23.65 points on the HPL profile. In addition, HPL scores were significantly higher in the older age group (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in terms of other socio-demographic characteristics (p>0.05). Besides, there was a positive and low level significant correlation between the workers’ HPL scale scores and only four subscales of SF 36 (p<0.05). Conclusion: According to the result of this study, the workers’ health-related quality of life was found to be below the Turkish community standards, with the workers’ healthy lifestyle behavior having been moderate. In addition, some sociodemographic characteristics had a negligible effect on the quality of life, and healthy lifestyle behaviors positively increased employees’ quality of life. © The Author(s) 2020; All rights reserved. Published by Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences Press.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.29252/johe.9.1.10
dc.identifier.endpage17en_US
dc.identifier.issn2251-8096
dc.identifier.issn2252-0902
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85168821024
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage10en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.29252/johe.9.1.10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36332
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRafsanjan University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Occupational Health and Epidemiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEmployeesen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectWorkersen_US
dc.titleAn Evaluation of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle and Quality of Life Among Turkish Workers, 2017en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files