Publication:
An in Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Using Three Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments

dc.authorscopusid23483332300
dc.authorscopusid15847878400
dc.authorscopusid25621192000
dc.authorscopusid8514094700
dc.contributor.authorTaşdemir, T.
dc.contributor.authorEr, K.
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, D.
dc.contributor.authorAydemir, H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:47:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:47:13Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Taşdemir] Tamer, Department of Endodontics, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkey; [Er] Kürşat, Department of Endodontics, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkey; [Çelik] Davut, Department of Endodontics, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkey; [Aydemir] Hikmet, Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the amount of extruded debris using three rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments (ProTaper Universal, Mtwo, and BioRaCe). Materials and methods: Sixty freshly extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were randomly assigned into three groups of 20 teeth each. The root canals were instrumented using ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Mtwo (VDW, Munich, Germany), or BioRaCe (FKG Dentaire, La-Chauxde- Fonds, Switzerland) NiTi instruments. Debris and liquid extruded from the apical foramen during instrumentation were collected into tubes. Then, the liquid inside the tubes was removed by lyophilization, and the mean weight of the remaining debris was calculated for each group and compared. Data were then statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's tests. Results: There were significant differences in the amount of debris extruded among all groups (P < 0.01). The greatest amount of apical debris was extruded by the ProTaper Universal group and the least by the BioRaCe group. Conclusion: According to this study, all instrumentation techniques apically extruded debris through the apical foramen. However, the BioRaCe instruments induced less extruded debris than the ProTaper Universal and Mtwo rotary systems. © 2010 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1991-7902(10)60017-7
dc.identifier.endpage125en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.issn2213-8862
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78049315454
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage121en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S1991-7902(10)60017-7
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000282671700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssociation for Dental Sciences of the Republic of Chinaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectApical Debris Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparationen_US
dc.subjectRotary Instrumentsen_US
dc.titleAn in Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Using Three Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instrumentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files