Publication:
Preanalytical Errors in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory and Relationship with Hospital Departments and Staff: a Record-Based Study

dc.authorscopusid6603064151
dc.authorscopusid58285256400
dc.authorwosidDündar, Cihad/A-1148-2013
dc.authorwosidDundar, Cihad/A-1148-2013
dc.contributor.authorDundar, Cihad
dc.contributor.authorBahadir, Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorIDBahadir, Özkan/0000-0002-0944-0139
dc.contributor.authorIDDundar, Cihad/0000-0001-9658-2540
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:16:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Dundar, Cihad; Bahadir, Ozkan] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionBahadir, Özkan/0000-0002-0944-0139; Dundar, Cihad/0000-0001-9658-2540en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectiveDespite many efforts to improve the overall quality of clinical laboratory service, errors that compromise patient safety and increase healthcare costs continue to occur even infrequently. We aimed to determine the causes of preanalytical errors and related factors by evaluating the laboratory records of a tertiary hospital.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 7,762,981 requests that were registered in the biochemistry laboratory records of Ondokuz Mayis University Health Practice and Research Center during 2019 were examined. All rejected samples were analyzed according to the department where they were collected and the reasons for rejection.ResultsOf the total sample rejections, 99,561 (74.8%) were preanalytical and 33,474 (25.2%) belonged to the analytical phase. The preanalytical rejection rate was 1.28%, with the highest rejection rate in the inpatients (2.26%) and the lowest in the outpatients (0.02%). Insufficient sample (43.7%), clotted sample (35.1%), and inappropriate sample (11.1%) were the first 3 rows of rejection reasons. It was determined that sample rejection rates were low during routine working hours and high during nonworking hours.ConclusionsPreanalytical errors were most common in inpatient wards and were most likely due to incorrect phlebotomy techniques. Education of health personnel on good laboratory practices, systematic monitoring of errors, and the development of quality indicators will play an important role in reducing the vulnerability of the preanalytical phase.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PTS.0000000000001115
dc.identifier.endpage242en_US
dc.identifier.issn1549-8417
dc.identifier.issn1549-8425
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36849433
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85160019565
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage239en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001115
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/42495
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000994312800004
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Patient Safetyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry Laben_US
dc.subjectBlood Sampleen_US
dc.subjectPreanalytical Erroren_US
dc.titlePreanalytical Errors in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory and Relationship with Hospital Departments and Staff: a Record-Based Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files