Publication:
A Comparison of Gingival Depigmentation by Er:YAG Laser and Kirkland Knife: Osmotic Pressure and Visual Analog Scale

dc.authorscopusid55748117000
dc.authorscopusid7801652658
dc.authorscopusid15847931000
dc.authorscopusid6603291949
dc.contributor.authorIpek, H.
dc.contributor.authorKirtiloǧlu, T.
dc.contributor.authorDiraman, E.
dc.contributor.authorAçikgöz, G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:26:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:26:54Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ipek] Hanifi, Private Practice, Eskisehir, Eskisehir, Turkey; [Kirtiloǧlu] Tuǧrul, Department of Periodontology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Diraman] Emine, Department of Molecular Biology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Açikgöz] Gökhan, Department of Periodontology, University of Aydin, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to compare osmotic pressure (OP) 1 week after the gingival depigmentation in two diffeent methods: Er: YAG laser and Kirkland knife. Methods: This study included 20 patients, 13 women, and 7 men who had esthetic complaints of gingival melanin hyperpigmentation. The left side of the maxilla and mandible were depigmented with Er:YAG laser using air and water spray and the right side was removed with a Kirkland knife. Gingival biopsies were obtained from attached gingiva of operation sides with approximate dimensions of 2 mm × 2 mm before and 1 week after the depigmentation. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain level experienced by each patient. Results: Patients reported no pain at the gingivoplasty sides after 4 days and at the laser sides after 3 days. There were not statistical differences between laser and gingivoplasty groups according to values of OP (P > 0.05). Conclusion: According to results of wound healing, OP and VAS, two depigmentation procedures can be used safely and effectively. © 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14764172.2018.1511912
dc.identifier.endpage212en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476-4172
dc.identifier.issn1476-4180
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30118615
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85052636123
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage209en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2018.1511912
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000482453300008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapyen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG Laseren_US
dc.subjectGingival Depigmentationen_US
dc.subjectMelaninen_US
dc.subjectOsmotic Pressureen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Gingival Depigmentation by Er:YAG Laser and Kirkland Knife: Osmotic Pressure and Visual Analog Scaleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files