Publication:
Effect of Electromagnetic Wave on Bone Healing in Fixed and Unfixed Conditions

dc.authorscopusid41262033500
dc.authorscopusid55763397200
dc.authorscopusid55346631600
dc.authorscopusid56241636900
dc.authorscopusid16637441400
dc.authorscopusid7403238396
dc.contributor.authorÖnger, M.E.
dc.contributor.authorGöçer, H.
dc.contributor.authorÇirakli, A.
dc.contributor.authorBüyükceran, İ.
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, M.
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:32:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:32:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Önger] Mehmet Emin, Department of Histology and Embryology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Göçer] Hasan, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çirakli] Alper, Orthopedic and Traumatology Clinic, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey; [Büyükceran] İsmail, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kılıç] Mesut, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kaplan] Süleyman, Department of Histology and Embryology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractMobile phones have come into daily life and are now one of the most frequently used devices for communication. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible effect of electromagnetic wave (EMW) with and without fixation material on bone healing. Forty male rats were exposed to fracture on tibia bone and were randomly divided into 4 groups as E(+)K(+), E(+)K(-), E(-)K(+), and E(-)K(-) where E(+) means EMW exposure and K(+) means Kirschner wire fixation. At the end of study tibia samples were taken from all the groups for the quantitative evaluation of regeneration. Significant difference was found between Group E(+)K(+) and E(-)K(+) in terms of both new bone and capillary volume. Electromagnetic wave may be harmful for bone healing with fixation whereas it has no same effect on bone regeneration without fixation. © Copyright 2016 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000002740
dc.identifier.endpage1608en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27526232
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84981717894
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1606en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002740
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000384271100087
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins kathiest.clai@apta.orgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone Healingen_US
dc.subjectElectromagnetic Waveen_US
dc.subjectFixationen_US
dc.subjectRaten_US
dc.subjectStereologyen_US
dc.titleEffect of Electromagnetic Wave on Bone Healing in Fixed and Unfixed Conditionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files