Publication:
Impact of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

dc.contributor.authorBilen, Cenk Y.
dc.contributor.authorInci, Kubilay
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Burak
dc.contributor.authorTan, Bekir
dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Saban
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorIDSahin, Ahmet/0000-0003-1354-988X
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:14:03Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:14:03Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.department-temp[Bilen, Cenk Y. -- Inci, Kubilay -- Tan, Bekir -- Sahin, Ahmet] Hacettepe Univ, Tip Fak, Dept Urol, Sch Med,Uroloji AD, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey -- [Kocak, Burak -- Sarikaya, Saban] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Samsun, Turkey --en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: We investigated the impact of percutaneous renal procedures on estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients and Methods: The GFRs of adult patients were calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula, and the patients were staged according to the Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative CKD classification system. The study included 185 patients with preoperative GFR values less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The impact of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on GFR was analyzed by comparing the preoperative GFR with the GFR before discharge and at postoperative month 3. Results: Patients with CKD had a significant increase in the GFR after the procedure. In postoperative month 3, the mean GFR was more than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in 25% of the patients with CKD and less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in 75%. While all patients with stage 5 CKD improved to better stages, some other patients' conditions declined to stage 5 from better stages at the end of postoperative month 3. No patient needed dialysis. The presence of urinary tract infections tended to affect GFR negatively. Conclusion: Estimated GFR, as a better indicator of renal function, is significantly affected by the PCNL procedure. While significant improvement was observed in late-stage patients with CKD, unexpected deterioration could occur in patients at earlier stages.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2007.0435
dc.identifier.endpage900en_US
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790
dc.identifier.issn1557-900X
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18393644
dc.identifier.startpage895en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0435
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/19347
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000256881700007
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endourologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleImpact of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files