Publication:
The Modified Ultra-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Technique and Comparison With Standard Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Prospective Study

dc.authorscopusid24604908400
dc.authorscopusid56490212900
dc.authorscopusid59157683200
dc.authorscopusid54390621100
dc.authorscopusid6506832248
dc.authorscopusid36192663100
dc.authorscopusid55893733300
dc.contributor.authorKarakan, T.
dc.contributor.authorKılınç, M.F.
dc.contributor.authorDoluoǧlu, O.G.
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Y.
dc.contributor.authorYücetürk, C.N.
dc.contributor.authorBagcioglu, M.
dc.contributor.authorKaragöz, M.A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:26:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:26:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Karakan] Tolga,; [Kılınç] Muhammet Fatih, Department of Urology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; [Doluoǧlu] Ömer Gökhan, Department of Urology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; [Yildiz] Yildiray, Department of Urology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; [Yücetürk] Cem Nedim, Department of Urology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; [Bagcioglu] Murat, Department of Urology, Kafkas Üniversitesi, Kars, Turkey; [Karagöz] Mehmet Ali, Department of Urology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; [Baş] Okan, Department of Urology, T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı,, Ankara, Turkey; [Resorlu] Berkan, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractTo compare the success and complications of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UPNL) and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SPNL) techniques. We prospectively analyzed 50 patients who underwent SPNL, and 47 patients who underwent UPNL. The patients with a stone size equal to or smaller than 25 mm and we used flipping a coin as the randomization technique. The mean stone size was 20.9 ± 3.6 mm in SPNL, and 20.3 ± 3.0 mm in ultra-mini PNL groups. Stone free rates were 88 % (44/50 patients) and 89.3 % (42/47 patients) in SPNL and UPNL groups, respectively, without any significant difference in between (p = 0.33). No major complications were seen in the UPNL group. PNL has been modified into micro PNL and UPNL parallel to the technological advances to decrease the complications of PNL. When performed as we do UPNL may be an alternative method to SPNL without any additional smaller-calibred nephroscope and with a similar high success rate. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00240-016-0890-9
dc.identifier.endpage213en_US
dc.identifier.issn2194-7228
dc.identifier.issn2194-7236
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27170277
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84966711348
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage209en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0890-9
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000398177700008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag service@springer.deen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrolithiasisen_US
dc.relation.journalUrolithiasisen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOperative Complicationen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Lithotripsyen_US
dc.subjectUrolithiasisen_US
dc.titleThe Modified Ultra-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Technique and Comparison With Standard Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Prospective Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files