Publication:
EPR of ?-Irradiation Free Radicals in Chicken, Duck, and Quail Egg Shells

dc.authorscopusid35555793900
dc.authorscopusid9843843700
dc.authorscopusid55909091300
dc.authorscopusid6603038421
dc.authorscopusid35856547500
dc.contributor.authorKöksal, F.
dc.contributor.authorDemir, D.
dc.contributor.authorKöseoǧlu, R.
dc.contributor.authorBirey, M.
dc.contributor.authorKöroǧlu, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:37:29Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:37:29Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Köksal] Fevzi, Department of Physics, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Science and Arts, Samsun, Turkey; [Demir] Dilek, Department of Physics, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Science and Arts, Samsun, Turkey; [Köseoǧlu] Rahmi, Halil Bayraktar Professional Higher School for Health Services, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey; [Birey] Mehmet, Department of Physics, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Köroǧlu] Ahmet, Department of Physics, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Science and Arts, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractChicken, duck, and quail egg shells were γ-irradiated and investigated by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) at ambient temperature and at 113 K. The EPR-active species after γ-irradiation were attributed to the ĊO<inf>3</inf>-, ĊO<inf>3</inf>3-, and ĊO<inf>2</inf>- radicals at ambient temperature and at 113 K. Furthermore, when the samples were stored in an oven at 423 K for about 1 h new EPR signals appeared at ambient temperature in addition to the above ones and these signals were attributed to the (CH<inf>3</inf>)<inf>2</inf>Ċ-R radical. These signals appear also at 113 K, but they are broadened likely due to the freezing of some of their motions. Any significant difference between the egg shells of poultry and those of village-grown chickens could not be observed in EPR spectra. The duck and quail egg shells exhibit the same signals and therefore indicate the inducement of the same radicals. The spectroscopic splitting and the hyperfine interaction values were found to be consistent with the literature data. © Springer-Verlag 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF03167008
dc.identifier.endpage210en_US
dc.identifier.issn0937-9347
dc.identifier.issn1613-7507
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-28844509702
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage205en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167008
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000233730000005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer New Yorken_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Magnetic Resonanceen_US
dc.relation.journalApplied Magnetic Resonanceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEPR of ?-Irradiation Free Radicals in Chicken, Duck, and Quail Egg Shellsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files