Publication:
The Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations

dc.authorscopusid59469510200
dc.authorscopusid8678178400
dc.authorscopusid14046455100
dc.authorscopusid8856334100
dc.authorscopusid24467225200
dc.authorscopusid24468841700
dc.contributor.authorKurt, M.
dc.contributor.authorKülünk, T.
dc.contributor.authorUral, Ç.
dc.contributor.authorKulunk, Ş.
dc.contributor.authorDanişman, Ş.
dc.contributor.authorSavaş, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:16:28Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kurt] Murat, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Külünk] Tolga, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ural] Çaĝri, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kulunk] Safak, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Danişman] Şengül, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey; [Savaş] Soner, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the various surface treatment methods on the retention of single crowns on implant abutments. The study included 50 single crowns that were cemented with adhesive resin cement onto the ITI solid abutments. The specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups, each including 10 specimens according to the following surface treatments: group C, control, abutments remained unaltered as control; group L, etching with CO<inf>2</inf> laser; group SB, sandblasting with 50-lm Al <inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf>; group MS: coating with titanium nitride (TiAlN) with a radiofrequency magnetron sputtering system; and group SP, silicoating by Silano-Pen. After the surface treatment procedures were finished, the casted crowns were cemented onto the abutments, and thermocycling was applied to simulate oral environment. The uniaxial tensile force was applied to all test crowns using a universal test machine (Instron) with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The load required to dislodge each crown was recorded in Newton. The lowest tensile bond strength values were obtained with group MS (223.26 ± 14.30 N) and significantly differ from all other groups except group C. Group SB showed highest test results (506.02 ± 18.04 N) and differs from other groups (P < .05). The test values that were obtained in group MS-group C did not show significant differences (P > .05). Sandblasting is an effective method to increase bond strength. Also, Silano-Pen and laser application is advisable for increasing the crown retention to abutments. Titanium aluminum nitride coating with magnetron sputtering technique seems to be ineffective.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00151
dc.identifier.endpage51en_US
dc.identifier.issn0160-6972
dc.identifier.issn1548-1336
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21142787
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84875487926
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage44en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00151
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000315556300007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAllen Press Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Implantologyen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Oral Implantologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCoatingen_US
dc.subjectImplant Abutmenten_US
dc.subjectLaseren_US
dc.subjectRetentionen_US
dc.subjectSurface Treatmenten_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files