Publication:
The Relationship Between an Accessory Maxillary Ostium and Variations in Structures Adjacent to the Maxillary Sinus Without Polyps

dc.authorwosidAvsever, Hakan/Aaq-7750-2020
dc.authorwosidSerindere, Gozde/Hph-0265-2023
dc.contributor.authorSerindere, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorAvsever, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:45:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Serindere, Gozde] Hatay Mustafa Kemal Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, TR-31060 Antakya, Turkey; [Gunduz, Kaan] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Samsun, Turkey; [Avsever, Hakan] Hlth Sci Univ, Gulhane Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The maxillary sinus and its variations are very important to dentistry and rhinology. Objective To investigate the effect of the accessory maxillary ostium (AMO) on the variations of adjacent structures of the maxillary sinus. Methods The computed tomography (CT) images of 400 patients were retrospectively evaluated. The prevalence of AMO was calculated. The relationship between morphological variations of adjacent structures of maxillary sinus such as agger nasi cell (ANC), Haller cell (HC), nasal septum deviation (NSD), hypertrophy of inferior concha (HIC), pneumatization of middle concha (PMC), mucus retention cyst (MRC), mucosal thickening (MT), and maxillary sinusitis (MS), as well as the presence of AMO, were investigated. Results Presence of AMO was diagnosed in 42 patients (10.5%), having been found in 4.5% of the patients only on the right side, in 1.25% of the patients only on the left side, and in 4.75% of the patients on both sides. There is an increasing incidence of ANC, HC, NSD, HIC, and PMC in the presence of AMO and MS. There is a decreasing incidence of MRC in the presence of AMO. Furthermore, AMO does not affect the incidence of MT. Conclusion This study showed that most parameters, except for MRC and MT, had increasing incidence in the presence of AMO. It is important for radiologists and rhinologists to have knowledge about the location of AMO and the presence of variations of MS adjacent structures to avoid surgical complications.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0042-1742325
dc.identifier.endpage555en_US
dc.identifier.issn1809-9777
dc.identifier.issn1809-4864
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36405481
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage548en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742325
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38946
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000748461900003
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGeorg Thieme Verlag Kgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectParanasal Sinusesen_US
dc.subjectSinus Anatomyen_US
dc.subjectSinusitisen_US
dc.titleThe Relationship Between an Accessory Maxillary Ostium and Variations in Structures Adjacent to the Maxillary Sinus Without Polypsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files