Publication:
Investigation of the Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

dc.authorwosidÇitir, Mesude/Hlq-5405-2023
dc.authorwosidKasap, Pelin/Aam-7529-2021
dc.contributor.authorCitir, M.
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, K.
dc.contributor.authorKasap, P.
dc.contributor.authorIDÇi̇ti̇r, Mesude/0000-0003-2015-8879
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:54:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Citir, M.] Univ Gaziosmanpasa, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Tokat, Turkey; [Gunduz, K.] Univ Ondokuz, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Mayis, Samsun, Turkey; [Kasap, P.] Univ Ondokuz, Fac Sci & Literature, Dept Stat, Mayis, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionÇi̇ti̇r, Mesude/0000-0003-2015-8879;en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In the presence of lingual concavity in the mandible, the cortical perforation and consequently the life-threatening intraoral haemorrhages obstructing the upper respiratory tract may be seen during the surgical intervention. The present study was aimed to determine the prevalence of lingual concavity in the interforaminal region and its relationship with gender and dentate status. Materials and methods: The images of 106 patients who underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) between 2016 and 2017 in Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology Department of Faculty of Dentistry of Ondokuz Mayis University were retrospectively examined. The images were obtained using a Galileos device (98 kVp, 15-30 mA). The bone height and width in interforaminal region and the frequency of lingual concavity were analysed. Results: Of patients involved in the present study, 42.5% were male and 57.5% were female After the examinations performed, the bone was morphologically classified into four classes as type I lingual concavity, type II inclined to lingual, type III enlarging towards labiolingual and type IV buccal concavity. Type III (77.9%) was the most common type in the anterior region, followed by type II (16.5%), type I (4.7%) and type IV (0.9%). The lingual concavity angle was 76.5 +/- 3.69 degrees and the concavity depth was 2.09 +/- 0.34 mm. Conclusions: The lingual concavity can be detected by using the cross-sectional CBCT images and the complications related with lingual cortical perforation can be prevented.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.5603/FM.a2020.0128
dc.identifier.endpage922en_US
dc.identifier.issn0015-5659
dc.identifier.issn1644-3284
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33084005.0
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage916en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2020.0128
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/40101
dc.identifier.volume80en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000727821300020
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVia Medicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFolia Morphologicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterioren_US
dc.subjectConcavityen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectDental Implanten_US
dc.subjectMandibleen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of the Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files