Publication:
Comparison of the Frictional Characteristics of Aesthetic Orthodontic Brackets Measured Using a Modified in Vitro Technique

dc.authorscopusid6508173204
dc.authorscopusid56175512400
dc.authorscopusid12783629100
dc.contributor.authorArici, N.
dc.contributor.authorAkdeniz, B.S.
dc.contributor.authorArici, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:51:46Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:51:46Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Arici] Nursel, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Akdeniz] Berat Serdar, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Arici] Selim, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The coefficients of friction (COFs) of aesthetic ceramic and stainless steel brackets used in conjunction with stainless steel archwires were investigated using a modified linear tribometer and special computer software, and the effects of the bracket slot size (0.018 inches [in] or 0.022 in) and materials (ceramic or metal) on the COF were determined. Methods: Four types of ceramic (one with a stainless steel slot) and one conventional stainless steel bracket were tested with two types of archwire sizes: a 0.017 × 0.025-in wire in the 0.018-in slots and a 0.019 × 0.025-in wire in the 0.022-in slot brackets. For pairwise comparisons between the 0.018-in and 0.022-in slot sizes in the same bracket, an independent sample t-test was used. One-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test at the 95% confidence level (α = 0.05) were also used for statistical analyses. Results: There were significant differences between the 0.022-in and 0.018-in slot sizes for the same brand of bracket. ANOVA also showed that both slot size and bracket slot material had significant effects on COF values (p < 0.001). The ceramic bracket with a 0.022-in stainless steel slot showed the lowest mean COF (m = 0.18), followed by the conventional stainless steel bracket with a 0.022-in slot (m = 0.21). The monocrystalline alumina ceramic bracket with a 0.018-in slot had the highest COF (m = 0.85). Conclusions: Brackets with stainless steel slots exhibit lower COFs than ceramic slot brackets. All brackets show lower COFs as the slot size increases. © 2015 The Korean Association of Orthodontists.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4041/kjod.2015.45.1.29
dc.identifier.endpage37en_US
dc.identifier.issn2234-7518
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25667915
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84921893721
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage29en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.1.29
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000348623800005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKorean Association of Orthodontists ungcha@yuhs.ac 603 Trapalace II, 1327 Seocho-Dong, Seocho- Gu Seol 137-070en_US
dc.relation.ispartofKorean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalKorean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArchwiresen_US
dc.subjectBracketsen_US
dc.subjectCoefficient of Frictionen_US
dc.subjectTribometeren_US
dc.titleComparison of the Frictional Characteristics of Aesthetic Orthodontic Brackets Measured Using a Modified in Vitro Techniqueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files