Publication:
Ultrasound-Guided Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation for Refractory Plantar Fasciitis

dc.contributor.authorErdoğan, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorBüyükceran, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorYurtbay, Alparslan
dc.contributor.authorCengiz, Tolgahan
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:48:10Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-tempT.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Samsun Üniversitesi,T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Plantar fasciitis (PF), which accounts for approximately 80% of heel pain, is a common condition affecting adults' quality of life. There are many different treatment modalities used in the treatment of PF. In this study, we compared the clinical and functional outcomes of patients diagnosed with chronic PF in our clinic who underwent USG-guided PRP (platelet-rich plasma) injection and patients who underwent RFNA (radiofrequency nerve ablation) treatment. Methods: Ultrasound-guided PRP injection or RFNA was performed on 95 patients who were diagnosed with chronic PF and met the inclusion criteria. This group of patients was followed for at least one year (October 2021-October 2023), and the clinical and functional results of the patients were compared. Results: The mean pre-treatment Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) posterior-ankle scores were similar, and no significant difference was found (P>0.05). A significant improvement was observed in the groups' FFI, VAS, and AFOAS scores after treatment (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was found in treatment modalities (P>0.05). Conclusions: As a result of the study, it was concluded that PRP injection and RFNA are effective treatment methods in patients diagnosed with chronic plantar fasciitis without response to other conservative treatment methods, but these two methods are not superior to each other.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18621/eurj.1388703
dc.identifier.endpage325en_US
dc.identifier.issn2149-3189
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage319en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1233596
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1388703
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1233596/ultrasound-guided-platelet-rich-plasma-vs-radiofrequency-nerve-ablation-for-refractory-plantar-fasciitis
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/46417
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe European Research Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMikroskopien_US
dc.subjectGenel ve Dahili Tıpen_US
dc.subjectGörüntüleme Bilimi ve Fotoğraf Teknolojisien_US
dc.subjectRomatolojien_US
dc.titleUltrasound-Guided Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation for Refractory Plantar Fasciitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files