Publication:
Ankaferd Blood Stopper: Does It Have a Role in Fracture Healing

dc.authorscopusid59866487300
dc.authorscopusid6602733768
dc.authorscopusid59889171400
dc.contributor.authorGünay, M.
dc.contributor.authorAmanvermez, R.
dc.contributor.authorKeleş, G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:17:00Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:17:00Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Günay] Murat, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Amanvermez] Ramazan, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Keleş] Gökhan, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To examine the effect of Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) on bone healing using a rat femur fracture model. Materials and methods: Eight rats were used as a control group (group 1), which was not subjected to fractures. The remaining 48 rats were divided into 6 groups of 8 each. The femoral shaft fractures were produced by cutting with bone scissors. One milliliter of ABS was applied to the fracture region of groups 3 (day 7), 5 (day 21), and 7 (day 45), or rats treated with saline instead of ABS on the fracture region in groups 2 (day 7), 4 (day 21), and 6 (day 45). After the treatments, blood was taken for analyses and fracture healing was evaluated radiologically according to the modified Lane and Sandhu scoring system on postfracture days 7, 21, and 45. Results: Fracture-hematoma formation interfered with ABS-induced hemostatic protein network or aggregation. Radiological healing scores observed at an average of 50% in group 3 were low compared to group 2 the first week, but fracture healing seemed to be normal at weeks 3 and 6. No statistical difference was observed for bone morphogenetic protein-2 and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline studied among the groups. FGF-2 level in serum decreased by an average of 37.3% and 32.6% in groups 3 and 7, which were treated with ABS, in comparison with groups 2 and 6, respectively. Conclusion: The application of ABS to femur fractures has no extra positive effect on bone union in fracture healing periods, except for bleeding control. © TÜBITAK.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/sag-1209-44
dc.identifier.endpage738en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84883001075
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage733en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1209-44
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000323610400011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTÜBİTAK Scientific & Technical Research Council Turkeyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnkaferden_US
dc.subjectBMP-2en_US
dc.subjectBone Formationen_US
dc.subjectFGF-2en_US
dc.subjectFracture Healingen_US
dc.subjectResorption Markersen_US
dc.titleAnkaferd Blood Stopper: Does It Have a Role in Fracture Healingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files