Publication: How the Repair Bonding Strength of Hybrid Ceramic CAD/CAM Blocks Is Influenced by the Use of Surface Treatments and Universal Adhesives
| dc.authorscopusid | 58973948900 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 26021842100 | |
| dc.authorwosid | Karaman, Emel/Hni-8898-2023 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dogan, Ibrahim | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karaman, Emel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-11T00:38:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.department | Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | [Dogan, Ibrahim; Karaman, Emel] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Samsun, Turkiye | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | We examined how different methods of surface treatment and different universal adhesives with or without extra silane affected the repair bonding strength of hybrid ceramic CAD/CAM restorations. Cerasmart specimens (n=320) were subjected to thermocycling and assigned to the following surface pretreatment protocols: control, diamond bur (DB), hydrofluoric acid (HF), and tribochemical silica coating (TSC). Half the specimens received a coating of silane, followed by application of the universal adhesives Futurabond M+ (FMU), Tokuyama Universal Bond (TUB), Single Bond Universal (SBU), or Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CUQ) (n=10). A hybrid composite resin was used to simulate repair; then the specimens underwent further thermocycling. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined and modes of failure were examined. The TSC-CUQ silane (-) group showed the highest SBS values. The best repairs were obtained when the surface was treated with TSC, with the exception of the DB-TUB silane (-) group. TUB increased SBS more than the other adhesives. Additional silane decreased SBS in the HF-TUB and TSC-CUQ groups, while increasing it in the TSC-TUB and DB-FMU groups (p<0.05). | en_US |
| dc.description.woscitationindex | Science Citation Index Expanded | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4012/dmj.2023-237 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0287-4547 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 38432950 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85189628096 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2023-237 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38172 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 43 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001342263500021 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Japanese Soc Dental Materials Devices | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Dental Materials Journal | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Bond Strength | en_US |
| dc.subject | CAD/CAM | en_US |
| dc.subject | Silane | en_US |
| dc.subject | Surface Treatment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Universal Adhesive | en_US |
| dc.title | How the Repair Bonding Strength of Hybrid Ceramic CAD/CAM Blocks Is Influenced by the Use of Surface Treatments and Universal Adhesives | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
