Publication:
Double Cantilever Indirect Tension Testing for Fracture of Quasibrittle Materials

dc.authorscopusid6602272146
dc.authorscopusid57211811269
dc.authorscopusid7004589761
dc.authorscopusid55823505000
dc.contributor.authorCaner, F.C.
dc.contributor.authorDönmez, A.A.
dc.contributor.authorŞener, S.
dc.contributor.authorKoç, V.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:27:08Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:27:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Caner] Ferhun Cem, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; [Dönmez] A. Abdullah, Department of Civil Engineering, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Şener] Siddik, Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Koç] Varol, Department of Civil Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) Mode I fracture testing has been widely used in fracture testing of especially fiber reinforced polymer composites and adhesive joints. Application of classical DCB testing to plain concrete or unreinforced ceramic specimens is not straightforward and cannot be carried out as in fiber reinforced polymer composites. Instead, an indirect tension approach is proposed in this study. Tests of notched geometrically similar DCB specimens made of normal and high strength concretes loaded eccentrically at the cantilever beam-column ends in compression have been carried out. Classical Type II size effect analyses of peak loads obtained from these tests are performed. The Microplane Model M7 is calibrated independently using uniaxial compression tests and employed to predict the peak loads of both tested and virtual geometrically similar DCB specimens. The same size effect analyses are performed on the predicted peak loads and the errors in the fracture parameters of the classical size effect analysis are determined. © 2018en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.029
dc.identifier.endpage86en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-7683
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057504962
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage76en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.029
dc.identifier.volume162en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000459525600007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Solids and Structuresen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Solids and Structuresen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectConcreteen_US
dc.subjectDouble Cantilever Beam Specimenen_US
dc.subjectFracture Mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectMicroplane Model M7en_US
dc.subjectSize Effecten_US
dc.titleDouble Cantilever Indirect Tension Testing for Fracture of Quasibrittle Materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files