Publication:
Could Calcified Triglyceride Bone Cement Be an Alternative Graft Material in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

dc.authorscopusid55327696100
dc.authorscopusid56261590400
dc.authorscopusid20733782300
dc.authorscopusid56797959500
dc.authorscopusid15063935100
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, S.
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, B.
dc.contributor.authorBaş, B.
dc.contributor.authorAltun, G.Y.
dc.contributor.authorAltunkaynak, B.Z.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:28:07Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:28:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yilmaz] Seda, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Private Clinic, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey; [Özden] Bora, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Baş] Burcu, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Altun] Gamze Yayla, Department of Histology and Embryology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Altunkaynak] Berrin Zühal, Department of Histology and Embryology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe ideal graft material for maxillary sinus augmentation is still a matter of controversy and the search for a more appropriate bone substitute for use continues. The aim of this study was to evaluate bone formation as a sign of the regeneration following maxillary sinus augmentation in rabbits using 3 different biomaterials, one of which is a newly developed graft material; calcified triglyceride bone cement (CTBC). Twenty-one New Zealand rabbits were used and randomly divided into 3 groups. Bilateral maxillary sinus augmentation was carried out and autogenous bone (AB), bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA), and CTBC were administered. Maxillary sinuses were dissected after fourth and eighth weeks of the operation. The bone formation was evaluated by stereological and histopathological analysis and the data were analyzed statistically. When the volume of primary bone is compared, statistically significant differences were found among all groups at both of the fourth and eighth weeks. The highest value was obtained from AB applied group. In BHA and CTBC applied groups, active bone formation, osseointegration of graft materialswere observed at both fourth and eighthweeks. InCTBCapplied group, primary bone formationwas only seen as linked to the continuation of parent sinus bony wall. The efficiency of primary bone formation of CTBC was found less than AB and BHA.Of the 3 graft materials tested, BHA is the strongest alternative to AB graft for maxillary sinus augmentation.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000003236
dc.identifier.endpage103en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27977491
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85006237867
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage97en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003236
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000392299200023
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins kathiest.clai@apta.orgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAutogenous Boneen_US
dc.subjectBovine Hydroxyapatiteen_US
dc.subjectCalcified Triglyceride Bone Cementen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary Sinus Augmentationen_US
dc.subjectStereological Studyen_US
dc.titleCould Calcified Triglyceride Bone Cement Be an Alternative Graft Material in Maxillary Sinus Augmentationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files