Publication:
A New Etiology of Occupational Asthma

dc.authorscopusid36339141700
dc.authorscopusid6603469127
dc.authorscopusid6504254305
dc.authorscopusid7801390016
dc.authorscopusid8621355800
dc.contributor.authorErkan, M.L.
dc.contributor.authorFindik, S.
dc.contributor.authorTatlisöz, H.
dc.contributor.authorUǧurlu, D.
dc.contributor.authorAtici, A.G.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T02:01:26Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Erkan] Mustafa Levent, Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Findik] Serhat, Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Tatlisöz] H., Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Uǧurlu] D., Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Atici] Atilla Güven, Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractA 28-year-old woman who has been working in a drug factory in Samsun for 10 years, during which she had worked at packing within first 5 years and is still working at manufacture department for 5 years, presented with a history of attacks of itching of throat, cough and dyspnea at workplace for 2 years. Occupational asthma was initial diagnosis and she was evaluated for confirmation of the diagnosis. Physical examination was normal, and also was pulmonary function test. Serum total IgE was 1268 IU/ml. Skin tests and bronchial provacation tests with polivinyl pirrolidon-iodur complex (Batticon®), dimenhidrinat (Anti EM®), and Rhizoma zingiberis (Ginger®) that all were manufactured at her workplace were done. Skin test with Rhizoma zingiberis was positive with 8 × 8 mm of which negative control was was 2 × 2 mm and histamine was 5 × 5 mm. Bronchial provacation tests with Rhizoma zingiberis was also positive and its results were as follows: initial FEV1: 2.97 L/min, FEV1 at 5th minute: 1.20 L/min (58% of initial value). The results of bronchial provacation tests and also skin tests with common allergens and the other two drugs to which she exposed during working were negative. To our knowledge, our case is the first case that reports Rhizoma zingiberis as an etiologic agent for occupational asthma.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage186en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-2996
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0034511004
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage184en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/47601
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOndokuz Mayis Universitesi Tip Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBronchial Provocation Testsen_US
dc.subjectOccupational Asthmaen_US
dc.subjectRhizoma Zingiberisen_US
dc.titleA New Etiology of Occupational Asthmaen_US
dc.title.alternativeYeni Bir Mesleksel Astım Nedeni: Rhizoma zingiberisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files