Publication:
Pandemic Hospital Site Selection: A GIS-Based MCDM Approach Employing Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets

dc.authorscopusid57213824725
dc.authorscopusid35225280700
dc.authorwosidSisman, Aziz/Hhc-1818-2022
dc.authorwosidÇalış Boyacı, Aslı/Agh-5462-2022
dc.contributor.authorBoyaci, Asli Calis
dc.contributor.authorSisman, Aziz
dc.contributor.authorIDÇalış Boyacı, Aslı/0000-0003-3337-2794
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:53:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Boyaci, Asli Calis] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkey; [Sisman, Aziz] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionÇalış Boyacı, Aslı/0000-0003-3337-2794;en_US
dc.description.abstractCOVID-19 poses many challenges for hospitals around the world. Each country attempts to solve the problems in its hospitals using different methods. In Turkey, two pandemic hospitals were built in Istanbul, the most crowded province. In addition, some hospitals were designated as pandemic hospitals. This study focuses on the methods used for site selection for a pandemic hospital in Atakum, a district of Samsun City, Turkey. As a solution to the problem, initially, spatial analysis was performed using GIS to produce maps based on seven criteria obtained from the insight of an expert team. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) augmented by interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (PFNs) was then used to determine weights for the criteria. Distance to transportation network was the most important criterion influencing the selection process and the least significant one was the distance to fire stations. Based on the criteria weights, and five rules specified by the expert team, 13 suitable locations for a pandemic hospital were determined using GIS. The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method was used to determine the final ranking of 13 alternative locations (A1-A13). A10 was identified as the most appropriate site and A11 as the least appropriate site for a pandemic hospital. Finally, sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate how changes in weight values of the criteria affect the ranking of the alternatives.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-021-15703-7
dc.identifier.endpage1997en_US
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344
dc.identifier.issn1614-7499
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34357491
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85112666288
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15703-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/40062
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000682420300007
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectPandemic Hospitalen_US
dc.subjectSite Selectionen_US
dc.subjectPythagorean Fuzzy AHPen_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.titlePandemic Hospital Site Selection: A GIS-Based MCDM Approach Employing Pythagorean Fuzzy Setsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files