Publication:
Investigation of the Effects of Hybrid Modeling Approaches, Factor Standardization, and Categorical Mapping on the Performance of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Van, Turkey

dc.authorscopusid54412893200
dc.authorscopusid57812662700
dc.authorwosidOzturk, Derya/J-5461-2015
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Derya
dc.contributor.authorUzel-Gunini, Nergiz
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:40:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ozturk, Derya] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkey; [Uzel-Gunini, Nergiz] Van Prov Directorate Disaster & Emergency, TR-65040 Van, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the effects of hybrid modeling approaches, factor standardization, and categorical mapping on the performance of landslide susceptibility maps. For this purpose, three models of frequency ratio (FR), weights of evidence (WoE), and certainty factor (CF) and six hybrid models based on the combination of FR, WoE, and CF with logistic regression (LR) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) were used to analyze landslide susceptibility in Van, Turkey. Eleven factors including elevation, slope, aspect, profile curvature, plan curvature, lithology, land use/cover, normalized difference vegetation index, topographic wetness index, terrain ruggedness index, distance to faults, and distance to roads were used. The analysis results were categorized into five groups as Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low landslide susceptibility using four classification methods of equal interval, natural breaks, geometric interval, and quantile; thus, 36 landslide susceptibility maps were obtained. We compared the accuracy of the maps using area under the curve for success and prediction rates, percentage distribution of landslides, and landslide density index. The results indicated that 26 out of 36 maps had good prediction accuracy but differed in predictive abilities. Furthermore, the comparisons revealed hybrid modeling improved prediction performance, and the AHP-based hybrid models gave better results than the LR-based hybrid models. The CF for factor standardization and the geometric interval and quantile for categorical mapping gave better results than the other methods. In the study area, however, the CF-AHP-EI, based on the categorization of the CF-AHP hybrid model using equal interval, provided the best result. The CF-AHP-EI landslide susceptibility map shows that 5.8% of Van has Very High and 34.4% High landslide susceptibility.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11069-022-05480-y
dc.identifier.endpage2604en_US
dc.identifier.issn0921-030X
dc.identifier.issn1573-0840
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134602757
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage2571en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05480-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38312
dc.identifier.volume114en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000828448000004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofNatural Hazardsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLandslide Susceptibilityen_US
dc.subjectFrequency Ratioen_US
dc.subjectWeights of Evidenceen_US
dc.subjectCertainty Factoren_US
dc.subjectLogistic Regressionen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical Hierarchy Processen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of the Effects of Hybrid Modeling Approaches, Factor Standardization, and Categorical Mapping on the Performance of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Van, Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files