Publication:
Factors Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in T1-2 Invasive Breast Cancer with 1-2 Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Presentation of Ondokuz Mayıs Scoring System

dc.contributor.authorKuru, Bekir
dc.contributor.authorSullu, Yurdanur
dc.contributor.authorYuruker, Savas
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Ilkay Koray
dc.contributor.authorOzen, Necati
dc.contributor.authorIDKuru, Bekir/0000-0001-7774-6431
dc.contributor.authorIDYURUKER, SAIM SAVAS/0000-0002-6371-337X
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:32:10Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:32:10Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.department-temp[Kuru, Bekir -- Yuruker, Savas -- Ozen, Necati] Ondokuz Mayis Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Samsun, Turkey -- [Sullu, Yurdanur] Ondokuz Mayis Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Samsun, Turkey -- [Bayrak, Ilkay Koray] Ondokuz Mayis Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Samsun, Turkey --en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the predicting factors for non-sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases in T1-2 invasive breast cancer with 1-2 metastatic SLN that fully matched the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria. Also, to develop a scoring system to predict the risk of non-SLN metastasis and to discriminate the low-risk patients for omission of the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in this population. Methods: Two hundred and seven T1-2 invasive breast cancer patients with 1-2 metastatic SLN who underwent ALND at our Institution were included in the study. Independent factors predicting the non-SLN metastasis were found using logistic regression analysis, and a scoring system to predict the non-SLN metastasis was created. Results: Seventy (34%) out of 207 patients had nonSLN metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that tumor size, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), number of negative SLNs, and size of SLN metastasis were independent factors predicting non-SLN metastasis. There were 68 (33%) and 108 (52%) patients with a the score of s 4 (predicted probability of <= 10%) with a false negative rate (FNR) of 4.4%, and <= 5 (predicted probability of <= 15%) with a FNR of 7.4%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) value for the Ondokuz Mayis scoring system was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93). Conclusions: The present Ondokuz Mayis model with an AUC of 0.88 showed excellent discrimination capacity to distinguish patients at low risk for positive non-SLN from high risk patients and could help spare ALND in an important portion of patients.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1136en_US
dc.identifier.issn1107-0625
dc.identifier.issn2241-6293
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27837614
dc.identifier.startpage1129en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13137
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000388782200012
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherImprimatur Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Buonen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAxillary Scoring Systemen_US
dc.subjectInvasive Breast Canceren_US
dc.subjectNon-Sentinel Lymh Node Metastasisen_US
dc.subjectSentinel Node Metastasisen_US
dc.titleFactors Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in T1-2 Invasive Breast Cancer with 1-2 Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Presentation of Ondokuz Mayıs Scoring Systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files