Publication:
Comprehensive Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Measurements and Assessments: A City Center Example

dc.authorscopusid16230640200
dc.authorscopusid36976208100
dc.contributor.authorKurnaz, C.
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:17:58Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:17:58Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kurnaz] Çetin, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Mutlu] Mustafa Melih, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Ordu Üniversitesi, Ordu, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) measurements were carried out between 2016 and 2018 in one the largest provinces of Turkey; measurement results are compared with the limit values determined by International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and Turkey’s Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA). In the first stage of a three-phase evaluation, short-term RF-EMF measurements were conducted in 500 locations over a 2-year period. In the second stage, short-term RF-EMF measurement results were analyzed to determine selected locations for long-term RF-EMF measurements to be carried out, including variation of RF-EMF during the day. In the last stage, band selective measurements were taken and the main sources of RF-EMF in the environment were determined. Overall, RF-EMF values do not exceed the limits determined by ICNIRP and ICTA, and they are below levels that threaten public health. In the short-term RF-EMF measurements, RF-EMF levels doubled after fourth generation (4G) systems were introduced. In the long-term RF-EMF measurements, RF-EMF values in the day are 35.4% more than at night. The total measured RF-EMF within the city center is 99.3% base station sourced. Among the six main RF-EMF sources, the devices operating in UMTS2100 band have the most contribution to total RF-EMF of medium with 31.2%. Additionally, we found short-term average electric field strength data are best described by the “exponential distribution,” while long-term RF-EMF measurement data is best described by the “Burr distribution”. © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-020-08312-3
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.issn1573-2959
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32382839
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084255230
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08312-3
dc.identifier.volume192en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000534057600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessmenten_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBase Stationen_US
dc.subjectICNIRPen_US
dc.subjectPublic Healthen_US
dc.subjectRadio Frequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF)en_US
dc.subjectShort/Long-Term and Band Selective RF-EMF Measurementen_US
dc.titleComprehensive Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Measurements and Assessments: A City Center Exampleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files