Publication:
Evaluating the Influence of Turbulence Models Used in Computational Fluid Dynamics for the Prediction of Airflows Inside Poultry Houses

dc.authorscopusid56541733100
dc.authorscopusid55976027400
dc.contributor.authorKüçüktopcu, E.
dc.contributor.authorCemek, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:26:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:26:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Küçüktopcu] Erdem, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Cemek] Bilal, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThere are various turbulence models in the computational fluid dynamics (CFD)literature but none has so far proven to be universally applicable. Accurate simulations require the proper choice of model appropriate for each particular situation. In this study, the performance of three types of k-ɛ turbulence model, the standard k-ɛ, renormalisation group (RNG)k-ɛ, and realisable k-ɛ, were evaluated for their ability to accurately simulate the internal turbulent flow of a poultry house. Each model's accuracy was analysed by comparing predicted and experimental results, and its performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (r2), the root mean square error to the standard deviation ratio (RSR), and a Taylor diagram, which provides a concise statistical summary of how well the correlation (r)and standard deviation (SD)patterns match. The RSR values obtained for air temperature and airspeed were 0.57 and 0.19, 0.30 and 0.16, and 0.64 and 0.23 for the standard k-ɛ, RNG k-ɛ, and Realizable k-ɛ models, respectively, and showed that the RNG k-ɛ model predicted the airspeed and air temperature best. Other models also provided good results, particularly in predicting airspeed; however, their air temperature predictions were not as accurate as those of the RNG k-ɛ model. The results showed that RNG k-ɛ presented the best results overall, whilst realisable k-ɛ did not meet with our expectations. © 2019 IAgrEen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.04.009
dc.identifier.endpage12en_US
dc.identifier.issn1537-5110
dc.identifier.issn1537-5129
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85064742850
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.04.009
dc.identifier.volume183en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000474323700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiosystems Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalBiosystems Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAirspeeden_US
dc.subjectK-εen_US
dc.subjectPoultryen_US
dc.subjectTemperatureen_US
dc.subjectTurbulenceen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the Influence of Turbulence Models Used in Computational Fluid Dynamics for the Prediction of Airflows Inside Poultry Housesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files