Publication:
The Optimal Surgical Approach for Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Retrospective Study

dc.authorscopusid47461487700
dc.authorscopusid57201655102
dc.contributor.authorÖzşay, O.
dc.contributor.authorAydin, M.C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:30:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Özşay] Oǧuzhan, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Samsun, Turkey; [Aydin] Mehmet Can, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe most effective surgical approach for solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study of 14 patients diagnosed with SPN between September 2013 and October 2021. Thirteen patients were female, and the median age was 39.5 (18–63) years. The mean tumour diameter was 5.2 ± 2.2 (range, 2–10) cm. The type of surgery was decided based on the tumour location and the extrapancreatic invasion status. The conservative (organ-preserving) surgical procedure was spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (n=3). The radical surgical procedures included pancreaticoduodenectomy, with either venous reconstruction (n=2) or without (n=4), and distal pancreatectomy + splenectomy (n=5); similar to performed for pancreatic cancer regional lymphadenectomy was not performed. Tumour resection margins were free in all patients. There were no cases of lymph node metastasis, but the number of examined lymph nodes was significantly higher in the radical surgery group (p=0.03). A female patient developed multiple liver metastases one year after distal pancreatectomy + splenectomy. Her number of examined lymph nodes was the highest of the cohort (n=24). The mean follow-up time was 40 ± 23.5 months. All patients were alive at the end of the study. In conclusıon; necessity for radical surgery may be associated with malignant behaviour. Therefore, the extent of the surgical operation may be expanded during radical procedures for SPNs. © 2022 Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.52142/omujecm.39.2.33
dc.identifier.endpage481en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-4483
dc.identifier.issn1309-5129
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85142116154
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage477en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52142/omujecm.39.2.33
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36887
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOndokuz Mayis Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectConservative Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectOptimal Surgical Approachen_US
dc.subjectRadical Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectSolid Pseudopapillary Neoplasmen_US
dc.titleThe Optimal Surgical Approach for Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Retrospective Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files