Publication:
Response of Two Catchweed Bedstraw (Galium aparine) Populations to Post-Emergence Herbicides in Winter Wheat

dc.authorscopusid6506641113
dc.authorscopusid6603843203
dc.authorscopusid6602187515
dc.authorscopusid23988464900
dc.contributor.authorMennan, H.
dc.contributor.authorStreibig, J.C.
dc.contributor.authorNgouajio, M.
dc.contributor.authorÇankaya, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:46:22Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:46:22Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Mennan] Hüsrev, Department of Plant Protection, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Streibig] Jens Carl, Department of Agriculture and Ecology (Crop Science), Det Natur- og Biovidenskabelige Fakultet, Frederiksberg, Hovedstaden, Denmark; [Ngouajio] Mathieu, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States; [Çankaya] Soner, Department of Animal Science Biometry and Genetics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractCatchweed bedstraw causes severe problems in winter wheat and other winter sown crops. Field experiments were conducted from 2005 to 2008 in wheat fields in Samsun, Turkey, to determine: (1) the response of catchweed bedstraw to chlorsulfuron, tribenuron-methyl plus thifensulfuronmethyl, dicamba plus triasulfuron and mesosulfuron-methyl plus iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium; and (2) possible resistance or tolerance to these herbicides. The herbicides were applied at the 2–4, 4–6, and 6–8 true leaf stages of biomass, there were large differences among the upper limits of the dose-response curves, and consequently, the actual response curve, an asymmetric sigmoid curve, was fitted to data to obtain 50% and 90% effective dose, ED<inf>50</inf> and ED<inf>90</inf>, values. None of the herbicides reduced catchweed bedstraw biomass or populations satisfactorily when applied at the recommended field rate. Twice the recommended field rate was required to achieve acceptable reduction in biomass. Overall, inadequate control of this weed cannot be solely attributed to either acetolactate synthase (ALS) resistance or improper application methods. It is likely due to a slow and progressive development of ALS-tolerant populations after many years of consecutive use. © 2011 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09670874.2011.622085
dc.identifier.endpage356en_US
dc.identifier.issn0967-0874
dc.identifier.issn1366-5863
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009635260
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage347en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2011.622085
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17521
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000299920800010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Pest Managementen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Pest Managementen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDose–Responseen_US
dc.subjectHerbicide Resistanceen_US
dc.subjectSensitivityen_US
dc.subjectTolerant Populationen_US
dc.titleResponse of Two Catchweed Bedstraw (Galium aparine) Populations to Post-Emergence Herbicides in Winter Wheaten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files