Publication:
Effects of Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques on Bacterial Penetration

dc.authorscopusid56212055300
dc.authorscopusid34980023500
dc.contributor.authorYücel, A.Ç.
dc.contributor.authorÇiftçi, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:25:30Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:25:30Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yücel] Ali Çaǧin, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çiftçi] Alper, Department of Microbiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare bacterial penetration following obturation with 5 different techniques. Study design: This study was performed on 120 teeth including negative control (n = 10), positive control (n = 10), and experimental groups (n = 100). One hundred teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups of 20 teeth each and obturated with System B (Sb), Lateral Compaction (Lc), Thermafil (T), Single ProTaper Gutta-percha (P), and laterally compacted ProTaper Gutta-percha (PLc). Enterococcus faecalis was used for determination of the bacterial penetration. Evaluation was carried out for 60 days. Results: At 30 days, the χ2 test showed that the slowest penetration was observed in Group Sb and Group PLc, which were not significantly different from each other. The fastest penetration in the all experimental groups was observed in Group T and Group P, which were not significantly different from one another. Also, there was no statistically significance difference (P > .05) among all groups at 60 days. Conclusion: It may be concluded that under the conditions of this study System B and laterally compacted ProTaper Gutta-percha prevent bacterial penetration of the root canal at 30 days. Furthermore, there was no difference among obturation techniques at 60 days. © 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.02.007
dc.identifier.endpagee92en_US
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16997102
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33748751464
dc.identifier.startpagee88en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.02.007
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000207879500017
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques on Bacterial Penetrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files