Publication:
Effects of Subtelomeric Copy Number Variations in Miscarriages

dc.authorscopusid55174210700
dc.authorscopusid59788593900
dc.authorscopusid23471430800
dc.authorscopusid7006266820
dc.contributor.authorTekcan, A.
dc.contributor.authorElbistan, M.
dc.contributor.authorTural, S.
dc.contributor.authorÇetinkaya, M.B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:51:11Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:51:11Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Tekcan] Akin, School of Health, Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Kirsehir, Kirsehir, Turkey; [Elbistan] Mehmet, Department of Medical Biology, Section of Medical Genetics, Samsun, Turkey; [Tural] Şengül, Department of Medical Biology, Section of Medical Genetics, Samsun, Turkey; [Çetinkaya] Mehmet Bilge, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study was performed on miscarriage samples for chromosome analysis to detect copy number variations (CNVs) related to subtelomeric regions, and with these results we aimed to adapt multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) method for prenatal diagnosis.Materials and methods: The cell cultures and DNA isolations were performed on 60 miscarriage samples. For maternal contamination analysis, DNA isolations and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reactions were done using peripheric blood of mothers who had miscarriages. We compared short tandem repeat peak profiles of miscarriage samples and mothers. The subtelomeric regions of the chromosomes were assessed using the MLPA method.Results: Of 43 miscarriage samples, 19 had normal karyotype (44.2%), 10 had numerical abnormalities (23.3%), and 2 had structural abnormalities (4.7%). Subtelomeric 16q duplication was determined in 2 of the 30 miscarriage samples investigated with MLPA method (6.6%).Conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05). However, the fact that the 6.6% subtelomeric CNV found in miscarriage samples was not found in controls, showed that further studies are required. We recommend that the miscarriage samples of the couples with recurrent miscarriage should be analyzed in terms of subtelomeric CNV after the exclusion of other clinical reasons. © 2015 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/09513590.2015.1032929
dc.identifier.endpage714en_US
dc.identifier.issn0951-3590
dc.identifier.issn1473-0766
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26291815
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84946497128
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage708en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2015.1032929
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000369949900008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd healthcare.enquiries@informa.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGynecological Endocrinologyen_US
dc.relation.journalGynecological Endocrinologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInfertilityen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectUrogenital Systemen_US
dc.titleEffects of Subtelomeric Copy Number Variations in Miscarriagesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files