Publication:
Is Oval Flap Reconstruction a Good Modification for Treating Pilonidal Sinuses

dc.authorscopusid56210371100
dc.authorscopusid57210665350
dc.authorscopusid37037560900
dc.authorscopusid36859412600
dc.authorscopusid56009442300
dc.authorscopusid6602086233
dc.contributor.authorPolat, C.
dc.contributor.authorGüngör, B.
dc.contributor.authorKaragül, S.
dc.contributor.authorBuyukakncak, S.
dc.contributor.authorTopgül, K.
dc.contributor.authorErzurumlu, K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:41:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:41:12Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Polat] Cafer, Department of Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Güngör] Bülent, Department of Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Karagül] Servet, Department of Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Buyukakncak] Sercan, Department of Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Topgül] Koray, Department of Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Erzurumlu] Kenan, Department of Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Flap techniques are acceptable for the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinuses. This study assessed a new modification of the rhomboid flap technique. Methods: The study included 133 patients with pilonidal disease who were treated between April 2004 and April 2009. The pilonidal sinus was removed with an oval excision, and an oval head rhomboid flap was prepared to reduce flap necrosis. Results: The mean age of the patients was 27.4 ± 4.6 years (range, 1380). The rate of minor postoperative complications was 11.3%. The mean hospital stay was 2.3 ± .8 days (range, 16). The rate of recurrence was 1.5%. Regarding cosmetic results, 116 (87%) patients were very pleased, 15 (11.2%) were pleased, and 5 (3%) were displeased. The mean follow-up period was 22.5 ± 12.4 months (range, 557). Conclusions: The oval flap reconstruction method is a recommended procedure that produces fewer ischemic flaps with a low rate of recurrence and acceptable cosmesis. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.025
dc.identifier.endpage196en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9610
dc.identifier.issn1879-1883
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20538254
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79151483060
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage192en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.025
dc.identifier.volume201en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000287430300009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherExcerpta Medica Inc-Elsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOval Excision of Pilonidal Sinusen_US
dc.subjectOval Flap Reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectPilonidal Sinusen_US
dc.titleIs Oval Flap Reconstruction a Good Modification for Treating Pilonidal Sinusesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files