Publication:
Rigid Ureteroscope Aided Insertion of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

dc.authorscopusid57188969719
dc.authorscopusid56204516400
dc.authorscopusid57086865100
dc.authorscopusid57188963533
dc.authorscopusid8406643000
dc.authorscopusid59157683200
dc.authorscopusid14059023600
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, I.
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, E.
dc.contributor.authorBedir, F.
dc.contributor.authorYilmazel, F.K.
dc.contributor.authorZiypak, T.
dc.contributor.authorDoluoǧlu, Ö.G.
dc.contributor.authorResorlu, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:33:25Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:33:25Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Karabulut] Ibrahim,; [Keskin] Ercüment,; [Bedir] Fevzi,; [Yilmazel] Fatih Kursat,; [Ziypak] Tevfik, Department of Urology, Ataturk University, Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey; [Doluoǧlu] Ömer Gökhan, Department of Urology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; [Resorlu] Berkan, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Germiyanoĝlu] Cankon, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare the outcomes of the ureteral access sheath (UAS) placement techniques in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery. Materials and Methods The patients were divided into two groups with respect to placement method of UAS. UAS was placed with the classical method, through the guidewire, in the first group of the patients (group I). The outer sheath of UAS was worn on the semirigid endoscope and placed into the ureter under direct vision in the second group (group II). The number of patients was the same in two groups (n = 42). Results Overall, 70 of 84 (83.3%) patients were stone free after the initial treatment. The success rates were comparable between the two groups (80.9% vs 85.7%, P =.859) 1 month after surgery. Fluoroscopy screening time (11.7 ± 5.7 seconds vs 0 second), UAS placement time (245 ± 138.4 seconds vs 40 ± 17.9 seconds; P <.001), and operation time (58.7 ± 17.1 minutes vs 51.2 ± 16.7 minutes; P =.046) were significantly longer in group I when compared to group II. The complication rate was higher in group I when compared to group II (23.8% vs 9.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P =.079). Conclusion Introducing UAS into ureter under direct vision while it was precisely worn on ureteroscope makes this step safer, and protects the surgeon and patient from radiation exposure by shortening fluoroscopy and operation times. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.028
dc.identifier.endpage225en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-4295
dc.identifier.issn1527-9995
dc.identifier.pmid26921643
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84964319397
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage222en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.028
dc.identifier.volume91en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000375901500066
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc. usjcs@elsevier.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrologyen_US
dc.relation.journalUrologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleRigid Ureteroscope Aided Insertion of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files