Publication:
Effectiveness of Four Rotary Retreatment Instruments During Root Canal Retreatment

dc.authorscopusid56516577100
dc.authorscopusid56212055300
dc.authorscopusid35225280700
dc.contributor.authorGöktürk, H.
dc.contributor.authorYücel, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorSisman, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:43:20Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:43:20Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Göktürk] Hakan, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Tokat, Turkey; [Yücel] Ali Çaǧin, Levent Academy, Dentistanbul Dental Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; [Sisman] Aziz, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to investigate the residual root canal filling material after retreatment of root canals using stainless steel hand files, and four nickeltitanium retreatment instruments. Materials and Methods: Seventy five extracted mandibular premolars were instrumented and filled. The samples were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=15) and retreated using Hedströmfiles, Mtwo R, R-Endo, ProTaper Universal Retreatment, and D-RaCe systems. The roots were digitally radiographed, then grooved split longitudinally to investigate the area of remaining filling material. The time of retreatment and the instruments fracture were also recorded. Results: The Hedström files left less filling material than the rotary retreatment instruments but a significant difference was found only in the middle third (p< 0.01). The apical third had the most residual gutta-percha and sealer compared to the coronal and middle thirds. The retreatment time for the D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment groups significantly shorter than other groups (p< 0.01). Eight Mtwo R files, 2 ProTaper Unwereiversal Retreatment files and 1 R-Endo file were fractured. Conclusions: All groups left residual root canal filling material inside the root canal walls. Nickel-titanium rotary retreatment instruments were faster than Hedström files but had a higher risk of instruments fracture.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/cdj.58140.5000039374
dc.identifier.endpage36en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84922826093
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage25en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140.5000039374
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry cumhuriyetdentj@hotmail.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.journalCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectNickelen_US
dc.subjectRetreatmenten_US
dc.subjectTitaniumen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of Four Rotary Retreatment Instruments During Root Canal Retreatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files