Publication:
Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Vitreous Hemorrhage Due to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

dc.authorscopusid54401920900
dc.authorscopusid16245928800
dc.authorscopusid24280274300
dc.authorscopusid56378253000
dc.authorscopusid6602733678
dc.contributor.authorYücel, Ö.E.
dc.contributor.authorNiyaz, L.
dc.contributor.authorEser-Öztürk, H.E.
dc.contributor.authorBirinci, H.
dc.contributor.authorSüllü, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-10T23:53:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yücel] Özlem Eşki, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ni̇yaz] Leyla, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Eser-Öztürk] Hilal, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Birinci] Hakki, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Süllü] Ýüksel, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the efficacy of the intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in cases of vitreous hemorrhage (VH) due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Materials and Methods: The data of 27 patients with VH due to PDR, who received previous panretinal laser photocoagulation, were analyzed retrospectively. 16 eyes received IVB were accepted as study group (group 1) and 11 eyes did not received IVB were accepted as control group (group 2). Efficacy outcomes were considered as the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline and clearance of VH. Results: Increase in BCVA in groups 1 and 2 was 0.99±0.80 (2.0-0.0) and 0.50±0.47 (1.3-0.0) logMAR, respectively. In both groups, the mean BCVA changed significantly during follow-up compared to baseline. Statistically significant differences were not seen between the groups in terms of changes in BCVA. VH cleared completely in 12 (75%) and 7 (63.7%) eyes in group 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.385). Average clearance time was 4.7±0.8 weeks in group 1 and 8.4±2.3 weeks in group 2 (p=0.099). The mean time to reach maximum BCVA was 7.3±1.8 weeks in group 1 and 12.6±4.0 weeks in group 2. Recurrent VH was seen in 4 (25%) and 1 (9.1%) eyes in group 1 and 2, respectively. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was performed in 4 (25%) eyes in group 1 and 3 (27.3%) eyes in group 2. Conclusion: IVB is applicable to shorten the clearance time of VH in patients with VH due to PDR. In this study, PPV requirement was not decreased with IVB in cases. © 2017 Gazi Eye Foundation. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage220en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-1256
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076316139
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36074
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherGazi Eye Foundation rmurat95@yahoo.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRetina-Vitreusen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntravitreal Bevacizumaben_US
dc.subjectPars Plana Vitrectomyen_US
dc.subjectProliferative Diabetic Retinopathyen_US
dc.subjectVitreous Hemorrhageen_US
dc.titleIntravitreal Bevacizumab for Vitreous Hemorrhage Due to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathyen_US
dc.title.alternativeProliferatif Diyabetik Retinopatiye Bağlı Vitreus Kanamasında Intravitreal Bevacizumaben_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files