Publication:
Masculinities, Spatial Dialectics, and Discursive Strategies: Reproducing Gender Inequalities at Home - The Case of Izmir

dc.authorscopusid57257318100
dc.authorscopusid36246494400
dc.authorwosidPeker Dural, Hilal/Hsh-2919-2023
dc.contributor.authorPeker-Dural, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorMese, Gulgun
dc.contributor.authorIDPeker-Dural, Hilal/0000-0002-3232-2763
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:08:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Peker-Dural, Hilal] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Psychol Dept, Samsun, Turkiye; [Mese, Gulgun] Ege Univ, Psychol Dept, Izmir, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionPeker-Dural, Hilal/0000-0002-3232-2763en_US
dc.description.abstractThe spatial dialectics reveal themselves in gender relations, which reproduce and maintain gender inequalities. This article analyses meaning-making processes around the home space and masculine identities that focus on spatialized gender relations. This research was conducted in the relatively modern city of Izmir, Turkey. The study explores the negotiation of masculine identities at home. The analysis draws upon critical discursive psychology and identifies interpretative repertoires and subject positions related to men's accounts of masculine identities, practices, and roles as men at home. Two interpretative repertoires were revealed that positioned men in two contradictory but complementary roles. Men were positioned as the primary responsible person for the home's public space-related needs and as helpers for domestic chores. Moreover, the 'help' discourse was used by men, referring to modernization. Also, various discursive strategies men used to legitimise their limited contributions to domestic chores were revealed. The findings discuss what these discourses accomplish regarding masculine identities, wider power relations, and gendered social practices that maintain them. Such discourses have a substantial role in reproducing and maintaining gender inequalities in the home. Revealing these discourses is important for changing the traditional understandings of gender and everyday discursive practices since discourse and ideology produce each other.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexSocial Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0966369X.2023.2170986
dc.identifier.endpage311en_US
dc.identifier.issn0966-369X
dc.identifier.issn1360-0524
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85147443788
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2023.2170986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/41526
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000919090900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofGender Place and Cultureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCritical Discursive Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectGender Inequalitiesen_US
dc.subjectHomeen_US
dc.subjectMasculinitiesen_US
dc.subjectSpatial Dialecticsen_US
dc.titleMasculinities, Spatial Dialectics, and Discursive Strategies: Reproducing Gender Inequalities at Home - The Case of Izmiren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files