Publication:
Cytodiagnosis of Erosive Melanoma and Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin Using Cutaneous Tissue Smear

dc.authorscopusid59157762600
dc.authorscopusid14039040000
dc.authorscopusid12752758300
dc.authorscopusid55557579800
dc.authorscopusid6603884140
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, Müge Güler
dc.contributor.authorMaier, T.
dc.contributor.authorBek, Y.
dc.contributor.authorRuzicka, T.
dc.contributor.authorBerking, C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:06:01Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:06:01Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Özden] Müge Güler, Department of Dermatology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Bayern, Germany; [Maier] Tanja, Department of Biostatistics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bek] Yüksel, Department of Biostatistics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ruzicka] Thomas, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Bayern, Germany; [Berking] Carola, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Bayern, Germanyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Cytomorphological assessment of erosive skin tumours offers a rapid and minimally invasive way to obtain a diagnosis. However, the studies so far conducted on this method have been relatively small. Aim To conduct a large retrospective study on cytomorphological assessment of erosive skin tumours. Methods In this study, 86 cytological smears prepared from erosive cutaneous tumours clinically suspicious for melanoma were examined to test the diagnostic accuracy and practicability of cytomorphological evaluation of such tumours, and to compare the assessments of two investigators with different experience levels. In a subgroup of tumours, cytological assessment was compared with dermoscopic evaluation. Results There was agreement in the cytological and histopathological results for 68 of 86 cases (79%) assessed by the experienced investigator and in 64 of 86 cases (74%) assessed by the inexperienced investigator. The diagnosis was confirmed cytologically in 39 and 34 of 42 melanomas, and in 28 and 27 of 35 basal cell carcinomas, respectively. The sensitivity of the cytodiagnosis was not significantly different between the two investigators. The dermoscopic evaluation showed good agreement with the cytological results for melanoma (82.4%), although use of dermoscopy was only possible for 49.9% of the lesions because of difficulties with the samples. Conclusions Cytological assessment of erosive melanoma and BCC lesions is a useful tool for gaining additional information on clinically uncertain skin tumours, and shows good agreement between different investigators. © The Author(s) CED © 2013 British Association of Dermatologists.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ced.12085
dc.identifier.endpage261en_US
dc.identifier.issn0307-6938
dc.identifier.issn1365-2230
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23517355
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84875305111
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage251en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ced.12085
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000316622700005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Dermatologyen_US
dc.relation.journalClinical and Experimental Dermatologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleCytodiagnosis of Erosive Melanoma and Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin Using Cutaneous Tissue Smearen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files