Publication:
Apically Extruded Debris Produced during Glide Path Preparation Using R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider and ProGlider in Curved Root Canals

dc.authorscopusid56471565700
dc.authorscopusid57755447700
dc.authorscopusid22934205900
dc.authorwosidKeskin, Cangul/Aca-8702-2022
dc.authorwosidSivas Yilmaz, Özlem/Ade-9373-2022
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Cangul
dc.contributor.authorSivas Yilmaz, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorInan, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorIDKeskin, Cangül/0000-0001-8990-4847
dc.contributor.authorIDSivas Yilmaz, Özlem/0000-0002-5669-8343
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Keskin, Cangul; Sivas Yilmaz, Ozlem; Inan, Ugur] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, TR-55200 Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionKeskin, Cangül/0000-0001-8990-4847; Sivas Yilmaz, Özlem/0000-0002-5669-8343en_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study aimed to compare the apically extruded debris produced during glide path preparation using R-Pilot (RP), WaveOne Gold Glider (WGG) and ProGlider (PG) with the subsequent preparation using Reciproc Blue in curved root canals. Mesial roots of mandibular molars with angle of curvature between 25 degrees and 35 degrees were selected (n = 20). The Myers and Montgomery method was used to collect and assess apically extruded debris. The glide path was prepared either manually with K-file, ProGlider, R-Pilot or WaveOne Gold Glider. Manual preparation group produced the highest amount of apically extruded debris (P < 0.05), while all groups caused debris extrusion. There were no significant differences among the extruded debris caused by RP, PG and WGG groups (P > 0.05). Apically extruded debris produced by engine-driven reciprocational or continuous rotational single file glide path instruments was similar, whereas manual glide path preparation was associated with the greatest amount of extruded debris.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSamsun Ondokuz Mayis University Research Fund [PYO.DIS.1901.19.001]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Samsun Ondokuz Mayis University Research Fund (Project No: PYO.DIS.1901.19.001). Authors deny any conflict of interest.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aej.12428
dc.identifier.endpage444en_US
dc.identifier.issn1329-1947
dc.identifier.issn1747-4477
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32820600
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089560684
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage439en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12428
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/43186
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000561068000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectApical Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectEmpty Tube Modelen_US
dc.subjectGlide Pathen_US
dc.subjectSingle File Systemsen_US
dc.titleApically Extruded Debris Produced during Glide Path Preparation Using R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider and ProGlider in Curved Root Canalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files