Publication:
A Comparative Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal from Teeth with Different Irrigation Solutions and Lasers

dc.authorscopusid35784439500
dc.authorscopusid26967545200
dc.contributor.authorKalyoncuoǧlu, E.
dc.contributor.authorÖzsezer Demi̇Ryürek, E.Ö.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:04:11Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:04:11Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kalyoncuoǧlu] Elif, Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özsezer Demi̇Ryürek] Ebru, Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of smear layer removal from teeth following root canals using lasers (Er:YAG and Nd:YAG), NaOCl, 17% EDTA, and MTAD by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Root canals were irrigated with 3 mL of 5.25% NaOCl after each file. Teeth were randomly divided into five groups. In the final irrigation, canals were irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl (Group 1, control), 17% EDTA (Group 2), or BioPure MTAD (Group 3). Laser groups were irradiated with Er:YAG laser (1.8 W, 120 mJ, 15 Hz) (Group 4) or Nd:YAG laser (1 W, 100 mJ, 15 Hz) (Group 5). The smear layer at the apical, middle, and coronal thirds of each root canal was imaged using SEM. Smear layer removal by EDTA was the most effective in all regions. The difference between EDTA and MTAD was statistically significant in the coronal and middle (p < 0.05), but not the apical (p > 0.05), regions. The difference between the control and laser groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In all regions, the difference between 17% EDTA-MTAD and the control-laser groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Although improvement was observed in removal of the smear layer using alternative materials and techniques, application of a combination of EDTA and NaOCl remains an effective technique. Copyright © 2013 Microscopy Society of America.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1431927613012762
dc.identifier.endpage1469en_US
dc.identifier.issn1431-9276
dc.identifier.issn1435-8115
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23931128
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84887979206
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage1465en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927613012762
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000330344800011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMicroscopy and Microanalysisen_US
dc.relation.journalMicroscopy and Microanalysisen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEDTAen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG Laseren_US
dc.subjectMTADen_US
dc.subjectNd:YAG Laseren_US
dc.subjectSmear Layeren_US
dc.titleA Comparative Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal from Teeth with Different Irrigation Solutions and Lasersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files