Publication:
QST (Quantitative Sensorial Testing) Evaluation for the Diabetic Neuropathy Patients with Thin Fiber Damage

dc.authorscopusid22942100300
dc.authorscopusid6603870128
dc.authorscopusid55411999800
dc.contributor.authorÜlger, F.
dc.contributor.authorTalu, G.
dc.contributor.authorYücel, A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T02:26:11Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ülger] Fatma Esra Bahadır, Faculty of Medicine, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dali, Samsun, Turkey, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Talu] Gül Köknel, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yücel] Ay̧en, Anadolu Sağlik Merkezi, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractEvaluation of QST (Quantitative Sensorial Testing) who diabetic patients have neuropatic pain with thin fiber damage. Thin fiber damage doesn't show with EMG at the patients who have diabetes mellitus depends on clinic neuropatic pain. In this patient group probable damage can show with QST also it can use efficacy of treatment observation. The patient group of 44 with diabetes have glove and socket like neuropatic pain, patients have normal EMG with the practice aim of QST their CS (cold sensation), WS (warm sensation), CPT (cold pain threshold), HPT (hot pain threshold) follow-up. In studied for 44 patients, 22 women-22 men admitted to diabetic. The average age of patients was 20-72 (48.97±13.07), their neuropatic pains were continuing for 3-18 months (10.40±5.27). 39 patients treated with oral antidiabetic and 5 of them treated with insulin. The average of blood glucose values were 125bmg/dl-198 mg/dl (154±18.86). The average VAS values on admission were 0-10 for CPT (6.5±1.73), HPT (5.65±1.92). QST evaluations were performed when we followed-up the evaluation of QST it determined 9.1% CS at 4 patients, 15.9% WS at 7 patients, 56.8% CS+WS at 25 patients of 44 patients. At 36 of patients 81.8% determinated sensation damage. QST evaluations of 37 patients were performed, HPT 4.6% at 2 patients, CPT 63.6% at 28 patients, HPT+CPT 15.9% at 7 patients 15.9% HPT+CPT identified pain threshold. As a result it's understood that follow-up and definition of neuropatic pain QST is an objective evaluation method as EMG.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage145en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-2996
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-35548954687
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage141en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/47935
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOndokuz Mayis Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElektromiyografi (EMG)en_US
dc.subjectNeuropathic Painen_US
dc.subjectQuantitative Sensorial Testing (QST)en_US
dc.titleQST (Quantitative Sensorial Testing) Evaluation for the Diabetic Neuropathy Patients with Thin Fiber Damageen_US
dc.title.alternativeİnce Lif Hasarı Olan Diabetik Nöropatili Hastalarda Kantitatif Duyusal Test Değerlendirmesien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files