Publication:
Synthesis, Structures and Biomolecular Interactions of New Silver(I) 5,5-Diethylbarbiturate Complexes of Monophosphines Targeting Gram-Positive Bacteria and Breast Cancer Cells

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

A series of new silver(i) 5,5-diethylbarbiturate (barb) complexes with the formulas [Ag<inf>2</inf>(μ-barb)<inf>2</inf>(PPh<inf>3</inf>)<inf>2</inf>] (1), [Ag(barb)(PPh<inf>2</inf>Cy)] (2), [Ag(barb)(PPhCy<inf>2</inf>)] (3) and [Ag(barb)(PCy<inf>3</inf>)] (4) (PPh<inf>3</inf> = triphenylphosphine, PPh<inf>2</inf>Cy = diphenylcyclohexylphosphine, PPhCy<inf>2</inf> = dicyclohexylphenylphosphine and PCy<inf>3</inf> = tricyclohexylphosphine) were synthesized and fully characterized by elemental analysis, IR, NMR, ESI-MS and X-ray crystallography. All the complexes display a significant affinity towards DNA with a groove binding mode and also strongly bind to BSA via hydrophobic interactions. Lipophilicity increases from 1 to 4 with an increasing number of Cy groups in the phosphine ligands. Screening of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of 1-4 against the strains of Gram-negative (S. typhimurium ATCC 14028, E. coli ATCC 25922 and O157:H7) and Gram-positive (L. garvieae 40456, S. aureus ATCC 25923, and ATCC 33591) bacteria demonstrated that all the complexes exhibit very high activity and specific selectivity against the Gram-positive bacteria, compared to AgNO<inf>3</inf> and silver sulfadiazine. Furthermore, the growth inhibitory effects of 1-4 on four human cancer cell lines (MCF-7, PC-3, A549 and HT-29) showed that 4 has a potent cytotoxic activity against MCF-7 cells, significantly higher than cisplatin and carboplatin. The effects of the complexes on the inhibition of the cells are closely related to their lipophilicity as well as DNA/protein binding. The induction of apoptosis of MCF-7 cells treated with 4 was probed through Hoechst 33342 staining, Annexin V positivity and caspase 3/7 activity. In addition, increased ROS levels in the presence of 4 are most likely responsible for damage to both mitochondria and genomic DNA. © 2017 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Description

Keywords

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q2

Source

Dalton Transactions

Volume

46

Issue

25

Start Page

8110

End Page

8124

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By