Publication:
An Integrative Anatomical, Morphological, Micromorphological and Molecular Approach to Turkish Epidendroid and Orchidoid Species (Orchidaceae)

dc.authorscopusid6505971041
dc.authorscopusid57192413825
dc.authorscopusid57214043592
dc.authorscopusid12762533400
dc.contributor.authorŞenel, G.
dc.contributor.authorSüngü Şeker, Ş.S.
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, M.K.
dc.contributor.authorAkçin, Ö.E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:10:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:10:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Şenel] Gülcan, Department of Biology, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Science and Arts, Samsun, Turkey; [Süngü Şeker] Şenay, Department of Biology, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Science and Arts, Samsun, Turkey; [Akbulut] Mustafa Kemal, Department of Garden Plants, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Canakkale, Canakkale, Turkey; [Akçin] Öznur Ergen, Department of Biology, Ordu Üniversitesi, Ordu, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to describe and analyse the morphological, anatomical and micromorphological traits of 36 Turkish orchids representing 12 genera (e.g. Anacamptis, Cephalanthera, Dactylorhiza, Orchis, Serapias) in detail and analyse their usability for solving phylogenetic and taxonomic issues. We applied UPGMA cluster analysis to anatomical, morphological and micromorphological characters such as root tubers, leaf and flower structures, pit, sclerenchymatic sheath, vascular bundle shape, crystal and starch, exodermis and endodermis structure, stomata type, bulliform cells in roots, shoots and leaves, surface structures like papillae, hairs and ornamentation on flower parts, leaves, fruits and seeds. Furthermore, in a phylogenetic framework, we analysed nuclear ribosomal ITS diversity in the same orchid species belonging, and in a combined Bayesian phylogenetic analysis based on anatomical, morphological, micromorphogical and ITS data we confirmed the usefulness of multiple data sets for effectively assessing taxonomically critical orchids. In the combined analysis, all genera were resolved as monophyletic with topologies congruent with recently published more thorough molecular phylogenetic reconstructions, while the trees obtained by seprately analysing the ITS and the anatomical, morphological, micromorphogical data were less resolved and partly inconclusive. © 2018 The Authorsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/njb.01700
dc.identifier.issn1756-1051
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85050539191
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01700
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11536
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000439934400002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofNordic Journal of Botanyen_US
dc.relation.journalNordic Journal of Botanyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnatomyen_US
dc.subjectITSen_US
dc.subjectMicromorphologyen_US
dc.subjectOrchidaceaeen_US
dc.subjectPhylogenyen_US
dc.titleAn Integrative Anatomical, Morphological, Micromorphological and Molecular Approach to Turkish Epidendroid and Orchidoid Species (Orchidaceae)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files