Publication:
Does Long-Term Use of Piracetam Improve Speech Disturbances Due to Ischemic Cerebrovascular Diseases

dc.authorscopusid23060045400
dc.authorscopusid23062131200
dc.authorscopusid6603649059
dc.contributor.authorGüngör, L.
dc.contributor.authorTerzi, M.
dc.contributor.authorOnar, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:40:34Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:40:34Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Güngör] Levent, Department of Neurology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Terzi] Murat, Department of Neurology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Onar] Musa Kazım, Department of Neurology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAphasia causes significant disability and handicap among stroke survivors. Language therapy is recommended for aphasic patients, but not always available. Piracetam, an old drug with novel properties, has been shown to have mild beneficial effects on post-stroke aphasia. In the current study, we investigated the effects of 6. months treatment with piracetam on aphasia following stroke. Thirty patients with first-ever ischemic strokes and related aphasia were enrolled in the study. The scores for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Gülhane Aphasia Test were recorded. The patients were scheduled randomly to receive either 4.8 g piracetam daily or placebo treatment for 6. months. At the end of 24. weeks, clinical assessments and aphasia tests were repeated. The level of improvement in the clinical parameters and aphasia scores was compared between the two groups. All patients had large lesions and severe aphasia. No significant difference was observed between the piracetam and placebo groups regarding the improvements in the NIHSS, BI and mRS scores at the end of the treatment. The improvements observed in spontaneous speech, reading fluency, auditory comprehension, reading comprehension, repetition, and naming were not significantly different in the piracetam and placebo groups, the difference reached significance only for auditory comprehension in favor of piracetam at the end of the treatment. Piracetam is well-tolerated in patients with post-stroke aphasia. Piracetam taken orally in a daily dose of 4.8 g for 6. months has no clear beneficial effect on post-stroke language disorders. © 2010 Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bandl.2010.11.003
dc.identifier.endpage27en_US
dc.identifier.issn1090-2155
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21227483
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79953746846
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage23en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.11.003
dc.identifier.volume117en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000289703500003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Press Inc Elsevier Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBrain and Languageen_US
dc.relation.journalBrain and Languageen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAphasiaen_US
dc.subjectCerebrovascular Diseasesen_US
dc.subjectIschemic Strokeen_US
dc.subjectPiracetamen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.titleDoes Long-Term Use of Piracetam Improve Speech Disturbances Due to Ischemic Cerebrovascular Diseasesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files