Publication:
Comparative Evaluation of Ankaferd Blood Stopper, Ferric Sulfate, and Formocresol as Pulpotomy Agent in Primary Teeth: A Clinical Study

dc.authorscopusid56019933100
dc.authorscopusid35730744800
dc.contributor.authorOzmen, B.
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:19:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ozmen] Bilal, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bayrak] Şule, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eskisehir, Eskisehir, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of the study was to provide a comparative evaluation of the clinical and radiographic success of Ankaferd blood stopper (ABS), formocresol (FC), and ferric sulfate (FS) as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Settings and Design: This is a clinical study. Materials and Methods: A total of 45 primary mandibular molar teeth in 26 children aged 6-9 were selected for the study. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups according to the pulpotomy agents (ABS, FC, FS). Following treatment, for 24 months, teeth were clinically and radiographically evaluated once every 3 and 6 months respectively. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS version 15 software was used in data analysis. Kaplan- Meier, Log Rank and Fisher's exact tests were used to analysis. Results: After follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 24 months (average 20.8±0.56), the clinical success rates for ABS, FC, and FS were 87%, 87%, and 100% respectively. The overall radiographic success was 87%, 80%, and 87%. When success rates of the ABS were compared with other agents, there were no significant differences between groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Similar success was achieved in the pulpotomy treatment of primary teeth that using ABS, FC, and FS. ABS would be considered a suitable agent for pulpotomy treatment and can be used as an alternative to other agents. © 2017 Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1119-3077.197022
dc.identifier.endpage838en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28791977
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85027679747
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage832en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.197022
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000407814700009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMedknow Publications B9, Kanara Business Centre, off Link Road, Ghatkopar (E) Mumbai 400 075en_US
dc.relation.ispartofNigerian Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.journalNigerian Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnkaferd Blood Stopperen_US
dc.subjectFerric Sulfateen_US
dc.subjectFormocresolen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Toothen_US
dc.subjectPulpotomyen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of Ankaferd Blood Stopper, Ferric Sulfate, and Formocresol as Pulpotomy Agent in Primary Teeth: A Clinical Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files