Publication:
Evaluation of the Effects of 2 Different Adhesive-Coated Bracket Systems on White Spot Lesion Formation

dc.authorscopusid58559158000
dc.authorscopusid55048420600
dc.authorwosidÖz, Aslıhan/Aap-6372-2020
dc.contributor.authorYelken, Ibrahim Ayberk
dc.contributor.authorOz, Aslihan Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorIDÖz, Aslıhan Zeynep/0000-0001-9168-5743
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:07:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Oz, Aslihan Zeynep] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Samsun, Turkiye; [Yelken, Ibrahim Ayberk; Oz, Aslihan Zeynep] Ondokuz Mayıs Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionÖz, Aslıhan Zeynep/0000-0001-9168-5743;en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study evaluated the effects of 2 different adhesive-precoated (APC) bracket systems on white spot lesions (WSLs). Methods: The study had a split-mouth design, and 34 patients were included. The APC Flash-Free (FF) and APC II system brackets were used. At the end of the treatment, digital photographs of each tooth were taken, the WSLs were scored, and lesion areas were calculated. In the same session, the mineralization level of the teeth was measured by DIAGNOdent. The 2 bracket systems were compared in terms of bonding time. Results: There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding the number of WSLs or the size of the lesion areas. In the maxillary arch, 55.3% of the teeth in the FF group and 61.2% in the control group were healthy. In the mandibular arch, no lesions occurred in 61.2% of the teeth in the FF group and 64.7% of the control group. In the evaluation of DIAGNOdent measurements, WSL formation was detected in 3 teeth in the FF group and 4 in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups in the evaluation of bonding times. Conclusions: The effects did not differ between FF and conventional brackets in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. The use of FF brackets significantly shortened the bonding time. (Am J Orthod Dentofacialen_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.020
dc.identifier.endpage867en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37656071
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169509052
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage862en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/41434
dc.identifier.volume164en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001125130800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the Effects of 2 Different Adhesive-Coated Bracket Systems on White Spot Lesion Formationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files