Publication: Evaluation of the Flexural and Repair Bond Strengths of 3D-Printed Temporary Restorations
| dc.authorscopusid | 60122394400 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 8856334100 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 59377851700 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 36552323600 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dincer, Nazmi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kulunk, Safak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kisakurek, Seniha | |
| dc.contributor.author | Duran, Ibrahim | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-11T00:34:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.department | Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | [Dincer, Nazmi] Medisam Oral & Dent Hlth Polyclin, Dent Sci, Samsun, Turkiye; [Kulunk, Safak] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Samsun, Turkiye; [Kisakurek, Seniha] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Mugla, Turkiye; [Duran, Ibrahim] Avrasya Univ, Dept Dent Prosthesis Technol, Trabzon, Turkiye | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the early bending strength of 3D-printed temporary restorations and the repair bond strength after different surface treatments.<br /> Methods Fifty samples of 25 mm x 2 mm x 2 mm in size were produced from methylmethacrylate-free photopolymer resin temporary material (GC TempPrint, GC, Japan) with a 3D printer (NextDent, 3D Systems, Netherlands). The samples were cleaned, polymerized, finished, and stored at 37 degrees C with 100% humidity for 24 h before testing.The initial flexural strength was evaluated via a 3-point bending test on a universal testing machine (AG-IS, Shimadzu, Japan).The broken samples were randomly divided into 5 groups for different surface treatments. In the control group, no surface treatment was applied to the fracture surfaces (Group C). In the other groups, sandblasting (Group G), sandblasting with a silane-containing agent (GS), sandblasting with 50 mu m Al2O3 particles (S), sandblasting with 50 mu m Al2O3 particles and a silane-containing agent (SS) were applied to the samples. The fractured surfaces were repaired with a high-filling flowable composite (G-Aenial Universal Flo, GC, Japan) and polymerized with an LED light device for 20 s.The bond strength was evaluated via a 3-point fracture test on a universal testing device. The data obtained were examined with one-way ANOVA and a paired sample t-test. The surface treatments applied to the fractured surfaces were examined via stereomicroscopy (Olympus microscope BX50, Japan).<br /> Results There was no significant difference in early-stage fracture strength among the groups (P > 0.05).There was a statistically significant difference in the repair bond strengths (P<0.05).The highest repair bond strength was obtained in Group SS, and the lowest was obtained in Group C. Conclusions Silane-containing agent application after sandblasting with Al2O3 was found to be the most effective method for repairing 3D-printed photopolymer resin temporary materials without methyl methacrylate. | en_US |
| dc.description.woscitationindex | Science Citation Index Expanded | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12903-025-06919-x | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6831 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 41023999 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105017748661 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06919-x | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/37559 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 25 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001586148300012 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | BMC | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Oral Health | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Temporary Restorations | en_US |
| dc.subject | Additive Manufacturing | en_US |
| dc.subject | Repair Strength | en_US |
| dc.subject | 3D Printing | en_US |
| dc.subject | Resin | en_US |
| dc.title | Evaluation of the Flexural and Repair Bond Strengths of 3D-Printed Temporary Restorations | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
