Publication:
A Comparison of Two Different Defensive Based Playing Formations on the Running Activity Profiles of Soccer Teams

dc.authorwosidÇetin, Onat/Afm-1560-2022
dc.authorwosidIsik, Ozkan/Izq-0392-2023
dc.contributor.authorCetin, Onat
dc.contributor.authorIsik, Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorBeyleroglu, Malik
dc.contributor.authorTokul, Erdi
dc.contributor.authorHazar, Muhsin
dc.contributor.authorIDÇetin, Onat/0000-0001-6841-5518
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:54:00Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Cetin, Onat] Yalova Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Yalova, Turkey; [Isik, Ozkan] Balikesir Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Cagis Campus,Bigadic Yolu 17 Km, TR-10145 Balikesir, Turkey; [Isik, Ozkan] Balikesir Univ, Directorate Sports Sci, Applicat & Res Ctr, Balzkesir, Turkey; [Beyleroglu, Malik] Sakarya Univ Appl Sci, Fac Sport Sci, Sakarya, Turkey; [Tokul, Erdi] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Yasar Dogu Fac Sport Sci, Samsun, Turkey; [Hazar, Muhsin] Gazi Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionÇetin, Onat/0000-0001-6841-5518en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to examine the effects of two different defensive based playing formations (3-Defender formation and 4-Defender formation) on both the reference and the opponent teams' running activity profiles. 8 official matches (n=4, 3-Defender formation; n=4, 4-Defender formation) of Galatasaray football team (Turkish Super League) and opposition teams performed with two different playing formations were monitored. The sample matches were monitored and analyzed using a multiple-camera computerized tracking system. Running activity data variables obtained from the software were analyzed in 5 different categories (total running distance in kilometers, mean speed in km.h(-1), high-intensity running (20 km.h(-1) to 24 km.h(-1)) distance in meters, sprint (>24 km.h(-1)) distance, sprint numbers. The results of this study indicate that running activity profiles of reference and opposition teams generally do not differ (p >0.05) according to the different game formation of the reference team. Only the reference team's total running distance was higher (p <0.05) in the 4-Defender formation than the 3-Defender formation (2.52%).en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.endpage71en_US
dc.identifier.issn1318-2269
dc.identifier.issn2232-4062
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage62en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/40095
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000770780300006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniv Ljubljanaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKinesiologia Slovenicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPlaying Formationen_US
dc.subjectRunning Activity Profileen_US
dc.subjectTime-Motion Analysisen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Two Different Defensive Based Playing Formations on the Running Activity Profiles of Soccer Teamsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files